Historical Background
The Indian Constitution was adopted on 26 November 1949 and came into effect on 26 January 1950. It is the longest written constitution in the world.
Constituent Assembly
- Formed under the Cabinet Mission Plan (1946)
- 389 members (reduced to 299 after Partition)
- Dr. Rajendra Prasad — President of the Constituent Assembly
- Dr. B.R. Ambedkar — Chairman of the Drafting Committee
- First meeting: 9 December 1946
- Total sessions: 11 over 2 years, 11 months and 18 days
Sources of the Constitution
| Feature | Borrowed From |
|---|---|
| Parliamentary system | UK |
| Fundamental Rights | USA |
| Directive Principles | Ireland |
| Federal structure with strong Centre | Canada |
| Emergency provisions | Germany (Weimar) |
| Amendment procedure | South Africa |
| Concurrent List | Australia |
| Republic & liberty ideals | France |
Key Features
- Longest Written Constitution — 395 Articles, 22 Parts, 8 Schedules (originally); now 470+ Articles, 25 Parts, 12 Schedules
- Blend of Rigidity and Flexibility — Article 368
- Federal with Unitary Bias — strong Centre, single citizenship, integrated judiciary
- Parliamentary System — Executive responsible to Legislature
- Independent Judiciary — Judicial review (Articles 13, 32, 226)
- Fundamental Rights (Part III) — justiciable, enforceable by courts
- Directive Principles (Part IV) — non-justiciable, guide policy
- Secular State — 42nd Amendment added "secular" to Preamble
- Universal Adult Franchise — every citizen 18+ can vote (61st Amendment, 1989)
- Single Citizenship
Common Mistake: The Constitution does not define "basic structure" anywhere. There is no article that lists its elements. The doctrine was entirely a judicial creation in Kesavananda Bharati (1973), and its contours are still evolving through subsequent judgments. UPSC tested this directly in CSE 2020 — both statements were wrong because aspirants assumed basic structure is codified.
Basic Structure Doctrine
Established in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) — the Supreme Court held that Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution but cannot alter its "basic structure."
Elements of Basic Structure (from various judgments):
- Supremacy of the Constitution
- Sovereign, democratic, republican form of government
- Secular character
- Separation of powers
- Federal character
- Unity and integrity of the nation
- Judicial review
- Rule of law
- Free and fair elections
Key distinction: India's amendment procedure (Article 368) has three categories: (1) Simple majority — like an ordinary law (e.g., creation of new states), (2) Special majority — majority of total membership + 2/3rd present and voting (most amendments), (3) Special majority + ratification by half the state legislatures (federal provisions like election of President, distribution of powers). Knowing which category an amendment falls into is critical for Prelims.
Landmark Amendments
| Amendment | Year | Key Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | 1951 | Added Ninth Schedule; restrictions on free speech |
| 7th | 1956 | Reorganisation of states on linguistic basis |
| 24th | 1971 | Parliament can amend Fundamental Rights |
| 42nd | 1976 | "Mini-Constitution" — added Socialist, Secular, Integrity to Preamble; curtailed judicial review |
| 44th | 1978 | Reversed many 42nd Amendment changes; Right to Property removed as FR |
| 52nd | 1985 | Anti-defection law (Tenth Schedule) |
| 61st | 1988 | Voting age reduced from 21 to 18 (effective March 1989) |
| 73rd & 74th | 1992 | Panchayati Raj and Municipalities constitutionalised |
| 86th | 2002 | Right to Education (Article 21A) |
| 101st | 2016 | Goods and Services Tax (GST) |
| 103rd | 2019 | 10% EWS reservation |
12 Schedules of the Constitution
| Schedule | Subject | Key Detail |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | States and UTs | Names, territories — updated with every reorganisation |
| 2nd | Emoluments | Salaries of President, Governors, Judges, CAG, etc. |
| 3rd | Oaths & Affirmations | Forms for President, Ministers, Judges, MPs, MLAs |
| 4th | Rajya Sabha seats | Allocation per state (based on population) |
| 5th | Scheduled Areas & Tribes | Administration of tribal areas (Articles 244(1)) |
| 6th | Tribal Areas (NE) | Autonomous District Councils — Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram |
| 7th | Three Lists | Union List (100), State List (61), Concurrent List (52) — Article 246 |
| 8th | Official Languages | 22 languages (originally 14; Sindhi added 1967; Konkani/Manipuri/Nepali added 1992; Bodo/Dogri/Maithili/Santhali added 2003) |
| 9th | Validated Acts | Laws shielded from judicial review (added by 1st Amendment, 1951) — but SC held in I.R. Coelho (2007) that laws violating basic structure can be reviewed even if placed in 9th Schedule |
| 10th | Anti-Defection | Grounds, procedure, role of Presiding Officer (52nd Amendment, 1985) |
| 11th | Panchayat Powers | 29 subjects (73rd Amendment, 1992) |
| 12th | Municipality Powers | 18 subjects (74th Amendment, 1992) |
Mnemonic: Remember the 12 Schedules sequence as: "States Salaries Oaths Rajya Tribes Tribes-NE Lists Languages Laws Defection Panchayat Municipality" — or the short form "SS-OR-TT-LL-DPM".
Seventh Schedule: Distribution of Legislative Powers (Article 246)
| List | Subjects | Examples | Who Legislates |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union List | 100 | Defence, atomic energy, railways, banking, foreign affairs, currency, census, CBI | Parliament exclusively |
| State List | 61 | Police, public health, agriculture, land, water, local government, state taxes | State Legislature exclusively |
| Concurrent List | 52 | Education, forests, trade unions, criminal law, marriage, bankruptcy, electricity | Both — but Central law prevails in case of conflict (Article 254) |
Key distinction: The 42nd Amendment (1976) transferred 5 subjects from State List to Concurrent List — education, forests, weights & measures, protection of wild animals & birds, and administration of justice. This is a classic Prelims question. Remember: "EFWPA" — Education, Forests, Weights, Protection of wildlife, Administration of justice.
Residuary Powers (Article 248)
Parliament has exclusive power to legislate on subjects not in any of the three lists. This is unlike the USA (where residuary powers lie with states) and similar to Canada.
Centre-State Relations
Legislative Relations (Articles 245–255)
- Parliament can legislate on State List subjects in 5 situations:
- During National Emergency (Article 250)
- On Rajya Sabha resolution by 2/3rd majority that it is in national interest (Article 249) — valid for 1 year, renewable
- When two or more states request Parliament to legislate on their behalf (Article 252)
- To implement international treaties (Article 253)
- During President's Rule in a state (Article 357)
Administrative Relations (Articles 256–263)
| Mechanism | Article | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Directions to States | 256–257 | Centre can direct states on executive matters |
| Inter-State Council | 263 | Advisory body for Centre-State disputes (set up in 1990 on Sarkaria Commission's recommendation) |
| All-India Services | 312 | IAS, IPS, IFoS — created by Rajya Sabha resolution |
| Interstate Water Disputes | 262 | Tribunals under Interstate River Water Disputes Act, 1956 |
Financial Relations (Articles 268–293)
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Finance Commission (Article 280) | Recommends distribution of taxes between Centre and States; currently 16th Finance Commission (chaired by Arvind Panagariya; report submitted November 2025, tabled in Parliament 1 February 2026; recommended 41% share for states in divisible pool for 2026–31) |
| GST Council (Article 279A) | Joint body — decisions by 3/4th majority (Centre has 1/3rd weightage, all states collectively 2/3rd) — inserted by 101st Amendment, 2016 |
| Grants-in-Aid (Articles 275, 282) | Centre provides statutory and discretionary grants to states |
Key Commissions on Centre-State Relations
Sarkaria Commission (1983–1988)
| Detail | Fact |
|---|---|
| Full name | Commission on Centre-State Relations |
| Chairman | Justice Ranjit Singh Sarkaria (retired SC judge) |
| Members | B. Sivaraman, S.R. Sen |
| Constituted | 1983 |
| Report submitted | 1988 (1,600-page report) |
| Total recommendations | 247 |
Key Recommendations:
| Area | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Governor | Active politicians should not be appointed; Governor should not belong to the Centre's ruling party when a different party rules the state; 5-year tenure; State CM should be consulted during appointment |
| Article 356 | Use sparingly, only as last resort in genuine constitutional breakdown — not for political instability or law-and-order problems; Centre must exhaust all alternatives first |
| Inter-State Council | Establish a permanent Inter-State Council under Article 263 (implemented in 1990) |
| Overall approach | Largely recommended maintaining the status quo in Centre-State relations |
Punchhi Commission (2007–2010)
| Detail | Fact |
|---|---|
| Chairman | Justice Madan Mohan Punchhi (former CJI) |
| Constituted | April 2007 |
| Report submitted | 30 March 2010 (seven-volume report) |
| Total recommendations | 273 |
Key Recommendations:
| Area | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Governor removal | "Doctrine of Pleasure" should be deleted; proposed impeachment of Governors by state legislature (modelled on President's impeachment) |
| Governor appointment | Entrust to a committee: PM + Home Minister + Lok Sabha Speaker + concerned State CM |
| Governor as Chancellor | Should not hold positions as University Chancellors |
| Article 356 | Proposed "localised emergency" — bring only affected districts under Governor's rule instead of the entire state; maximum duration: 3 months |
Sarkaria vs Punchhi — Key Differences
| Issue | Sarkaria (1988) | Punchhi (2010) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall approach | Status quo with minor tweaks | Significant structural reforms |
| Governor removal | Restraint by Centre | Formal impeachment mechanism |
| Governor appointment | CM consultation | Formal committee (PM + HM + Speaker + CM) |
| Article 356 | "Use sparingly" | Localised emergency instead of full state takeover |
UPSC Relevance: Sarkaria and Punchhi Commissions are directly tested in Prelims (number of recommendations, key proposals) and Mains (Centre-State reform debates). The key difference to remember: Sarkaria was conservative (status quo), Punchhi was reformist (structural changes). Neither commission's recommendations have been fully implemented.
Inter-State Council (Article 263)
| Detail | Fact |
|---|---|
| Constitutional basis | Article 263 |
| Established | 28 May 1990 by Presidential Order (on Sarkaria Commission's recommendation) |
| Latest reconstitution | May 2022 — PM as Chairman; CMs of all states and UTs with legislatures; select Union Cabinet Ministers |
| Meetings held | Only 11 meetings since 1990; last full meeting in July 2016 |
| Criticism | Despite mandate of regular meetings, the Council has remained largely dormant — a major gap in cooperative federalism |
Recent Federalism Debates
One Nation One Election
| Detail | Fact |
|---|---|
| Committee | High-Level Committee headed by former President Ram Nath Kovind |
| Constituted | 2 September 2023 |
| Report | 18,626-page report after 191 days |
| Key recommendation | Phase 1: Simultaneous Lok Sabha + State Assembly elections; Phase 2: Municipal and Panchayat elections within 100 days |
| Public response | 21,500+ responses; ~80% in favour |
| Cabinet acceptance | 18 September 2024 |
| Legislative progress | Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024 introduced in Lok Sabha on 17 December 2024; referred to Joint Parliamentary Committee on 19 December 2024 |
Governor Controversies — SC Rulings (2025)
| Ruling | Key Holding |
|---|---|
| State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor (April 2025) | SC ruled Governors cannot sit indefinitely on Bills; no "absolute veto" or "pocket veto" exists under Article 200; prescribed timelines (1 month to withhold assent, 3 months if acting against Cabinet advice) |
| Presidential Reference (November 2025) | 5-judge Constitution Bench overruled the April ruling; held President and Governors cannot be bound by judicially imposed timelines; rejected "deemed assent" doctrine; decisions under Articles 200 and 201 held not justiciable |
Warning: The Governor controversy is a live, evolving issue. The November 2025 Presidential Reference overruled the April 2025 judgment — so be careful citing the "timelines for Governors" in answers. The current legal position is that no judicial timelines can be imposed on the Governor/President for acting on Bills.
GST Council as Cooperative Federalism
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Constitutional basis | Article 279A (101st Amendment, 2016) |
| Voting structure | Centre: 1/3 of total votes; all States collectively: 2/3; decisions require 3/4 majority |
| Design | Neither Centre nor states can override unilaterally — a constitutional innovation in fiscal federalism |
| SC ruling (Union of India v. Mohit Minerals, May 2022) | GST Council recommendations are not binding — they have only persuasive value; legislative power rests with Parliament and State legislatures under Article 246A |
Cooperative vs Competitive Federalism
NITI Aayog's Role
NITI Aayog (constituted 1 January 2015) replaced the Planning Commission to actualise cooperative federalism — it does not impose centrally designed plans but enables states to adapt policies autonomously.
Competitive Federalism — State Rankings:
NITI Aayog promotes healthy competition among states through transparent indices:
| Index | What It Measures |
|---|---|
| School Education Quality Index | Learning outcomes, access, equity |
| State Health Index | Health outcomes, governance, key inputs |
| Composite Water Management Index | Groundwater, restoration, policy, governance |
| SDG India Index | Progress on 17 Sustainable Development Goals |
| India Innovation Index | Innovation ecosystem across states |
| Export Competitiveness Index | State-level export performance |
Aspirational Districts Programme (ADP)
| Detail | Fact |
|---|---|
| Launched | January 2018 |
| Coverage | 112 most under-developed districts (minimum 1 per state) |
| Framework | 49 KPIs across 5 themes: Health & Nutrition, Education, Agriculture & Water, Financial Inclusion & Skills, Infrastructure |
| Impact | By 2019, 8 districts moved from Tier IV to Tier I; over 25 crore people positively impacted (as of Oct 2022) |
| Model | Convergence of central and state schemes + district-level governance innovation — exemplifies cooperative and competitive federalism simultaneously |
Important for UPSC
Prelims Focus
- 12 Schedules — what each contains, which amendment added 9th/10th/11th/12th
- Seventh Schedule — number of subjects in each list (100/61/52), subjects transferred by 42nd Amendment
- Basic Structure elements — not codified, judicial creation
- Amendment categories — simple majority vs special majority vs special + state ratification
- Constituent Assembly facts — 389→299 members, first meeting 9 Dec 1946, Drafting Committee 7 members
- Residuary powers with Parliament (not states — unlike USA)
- Sarkaria Commission: 1983, 247 recommendations; Punchhi Commission: 2007, 273 recommendations
- Inter-State Council: Article 263, established 1990, only 11 meetings
- GST Council: Article 279A, 3/4 majority, recommendations not binding (Mohit Minerals, 2022)
- One Nation One Election: Kovind Committee, 129th Amendment Bill (Dec 2024)
Mains Dimensions
- Cooperative vs Competitive Federalism — GST Council as model; NITI Aayog rankings; Aspirational Districts Programme
- Basic Structure — judicial overreach or safeguard? Compare with UK (Parliamentary sovereignty) and USA (constitutional amendments unchecked)
- Centre-State tensions — Governor's role, Article 356 misuse, fiscal autonomy, One Nation One Election implications
- 42nd vs 44th Amendment — Indira Gandhi's centralisation vs Morarji Desai's corrective; analyse which provisions survived
- Sarkaria vs Punchhi — Compare approaches to Governor's role and Article 356; evaluate why recommendations remain unimplemented
- Governor controversies — The 2025 SC rulings on Bills; balance between federalism and executive authority
Vocabulary
Constituent Assembly
- Pronunciation: /kənˌstɪtʃuənt əˈsɛmbli/
- Definition: A body of elected representatives empowered to draft or adopt a constitution for a country.
- Origin: From Latin constituere ("to set up, establish") + Old French assemblee ("a gathering"), from assembler ("to bring together").
Dominion
- Pronunciation: /dəˈmɪnjən/
- Definition: A self-governing territory within the British Empire that acknowledged the Crown as head of state while exercising internal sovereignty.
- Origin: From Middle English dominion, via Old French from Latin dominium ("lordship, right of ownership"), from dominus ("lord"), from domus ("house").
Sovereignty
- Pronunciation: /ˈsɒvrənti/
- Definition: The supreme and independent authority of a state to govern itself without external interference.
- Origin: From late Middle English, via Old French sovereinete, from soverain, based on Latin super ("above").
Key Terms
Cabinet Mission Plan
- Pronunciation: /ˈkæbɪnɪt ˈmɪʃən plæn/
- Definition: A 1946 British proposal by three Cabinet ministers — Lord Pethick-Lawrence (Secretary of State for India), Sir Stafford Cripps (President of the Board of Trade), and A.V. Alexander (First Lord of the Admiralty) — that rejected the demand for a separate Pakistan, recommended a three-tier federal structure for undivided India (Union at the top, Groups of Provinces in the middle, individual Provinces at the bottom), and laid the framework for the formation of the Constituent Assembly with 389 members (292 from provincial assemblies, 4 from chief commissioner's provinces, and 93 from princely states).
- Context: The three-member delegation arrived in New Delhi on 24 March 1946 to negotiate the transfer of power from British to Indian hands. Their plan proposed three groups: Group A (Hindu-majority provinces — Madras, Bombay, UP, Bihar, CP, Orissa), Group B (Muslim-majority provinces of northwest — Punjab, NWFP, Sindh, Baluchistan), and Group C (Bengal and Assam). Both the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League initially accepted the plan (June 1946), but disagreements over the compulsory vs voluntary nature of provincial grouping led to its collapse. Jawaharlal Nehru's press conference statement (10 July 1946) that the Congress was free to modify the plan within the Constituent Assembly prompted the Muslim League to withdraw its acceptance and call for "Direct Action Day" (16 August 1946), ultimately leading to Partition. Despite its failure as a unity plan, the Cabinet Mission's framework for the Constituent Assembly endured — the Assembly was constituted under this plan's provisions and began work on 9 December 1946.
- UPSC Relevance: GS2 Polity — Prelims: three members and their portfolios (Pethick-Lawrence, Cripps, Alexander), year (1946), arrival date (24 March 1946), three-tier structure proposed (Union-Groups-Provinces), rejected separate Pakistan demand, Constituent Assembly of 389 members formed under this plan; Mains: role of the Cabinet Mission in shaping India's federal structure, why the plan failed (grouping controversy — compulsory vs voluntary grouping, Nehru's 10 July 1946 statement), its legacy in the Constitution's federal design, comparison with the earlier Cripps Mission (1942) and the Mountbatten Plan (1947).
Objectives Resolution
- Pronunciation: /əbˈdʒɛktɪvz ˌrɛzəˈluːʃən/
- Definition: A historic resolution moved by Jawaharlal Nehru on 13 December 1946 and adopted unanimously by the Constituent Assembly on 22 January 1947 (with all members standing), laying down the guiding principles and aspirations — including sovereignty, justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity — that formed the philosophical foundation and blueprint for the Indian Constitution's Preamble. It declared India's resolve to constitute itself into a "Sovereign Independent Republic" and to secure justice, equality, and freedom for all citizens, with adequate safeguards for minorities, backward and tribal areas, and depressed classes.
- Context: After Nehru introduced the Resolution on 13 December 1946, it was debated extensively over several days (16-19 December 1946), then deferred and resumed on 21 January 1947, before being adopted unanimously on 22 January 1947. Key differences between the Objectives Resolution and the final Preamble: (1) the Resolution used "Sovereign Independent Republic" — the word "Independent" was dropped from the Preamble as redundant (sovereignty implies independence); (2) the Resolution explicitly mentioned safeguards for minorities, backward classes, and tribal areas — these found expression in Fundamental Rights (Articles 29-30) and DPSPs (Article 46) rather than the Preamble text; (3) the words "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity" were not in the Resolution or the original Preamble — they were added only by the 42nd Amendment (1976). The Preamble was the last item debated by the Constituent Assembly (17 October 1949) — after all other articles had been finalised — and was adopted as part of the Constitution on 26 November 1949.
- UPSC Relevance: GS2 Polity — Prelims: who moved it (Nehru), dates (moved 13 December 1946, adopted 22 January 1947), relationship to the Preamble, difference between Resolution text and final Preamble ("Independent" dropped, minority safeguards moved to Parts III and IV), the Preamble was debated last (17 October 1949); Mains: how the Objectives Resolution shaped the Constitution's philosophical framework, the transition from Resolution to Preamble — what was retained, modified, or dropped and why, significance of the Resolution as a "declaration of intent" that guided the entire constitution-making process over nearly three years.
Current Affairs Connect
| Topic | Where to Follow | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Centre-State disputes & federalism | Ujiyari — Polity News | Governor controversies, Article 356, fiscal federalism — live exam material |
| Constitutional amendment Bills | Ujiyari — Editorials | Every amendment connects to the Basic Structure doctrine debate |
| SC rulings on federal structure | Ujiyari — Daily Updates | Federalism is tested through current disputes — GST, education, water-sharing |
Exam tip: Map every Centre-State conflict to a Constitutional provision. Read Ujiyari polity coverage for live examples.
Sources: Constitution of India, PRS India
BharatNotes