Framework: What is Public Policy?
Public policy is the purposive course of action adopted by government — involving authoritative choice on how to allocate resources, regulate behaviour, or deliver services to achieve a declared public objective. In India, public policy flows from three layers:
| Layer | Source | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Constitutional policy | Directive Principles, Preamble | Article 39(b)(c) — equitable distribution of resources → land reform laws |
| Legislative policy | Acts of Parliament / State Legislatures | RTI Act 2005, NFSA 2013, FRA 2006 |
| Executive policy | Cabinet decisions, schemes, notifications | PM Ujjwala Yojana, DBT, PM-KISAN |
UPSC's GS2 syllabus treats this topic as "Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation" — requiring candidates to master both the process (how policy is made) and the pathology (where it breaks down).
1. The Policy Cycle Framework
The classical policy cycle — adapted from Harold Lasswell and refined by Charles Jones — identifies six stages. In India these stages are blurred, iterative and politically contested.
| Stage | What Happens | Indian Illustration |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Identification | A public problem is recognised as demanding state action | Open defecation (pre-2014) → identified as dignity + health crisis |
| Agenda Setting | Issue is placed on government's priority list | Swachh Bharat Mission announced 15 August 2014 from Red Fort |
| Policy Formulation | Options are generated, costed, debated | Expert committees, pre-legislative consultation, inter-ministerial notes |
| Adoption / Legitimation | Cabinet approval / Parliamentary enactment | Cabinet note → Cabinet Committee → Parliament / Executive order |
| Implementation | Rules framed; ministries, states, districts deliver | MoHUA / DDWS → State Missions → ULBs / Gram Panchayats |
| Evaluation & Feedback | Outputs and outcomes are reviewed; corrections made | DMEO third-party evaluations; CAG audits; mid-course redesign |
Indian reality check: The stages often run in parallel — schemes are announced before formulation is complete, rules are notified years after the Act (e.g., Data Protection Act 2023 rules still being notified), and evaluation frequently lags implementation by a full cycle.
2. Key Institutional Actors
2.1 The Core Executive
| Actor | Role in Policy Process |
|---|---|
| Prime Minister's Office (PMO) | Sets the policy agenda; clears Cabinet notes; runs PRAGATI reviews; drives flagship programmes |
| Cabinet Secretariat | Apex coordinator — circulates Cabinet notes, convenes Committees of Secretaries (CoS), resolves inter-ministerial disputes |
| Cabinet Committees | CCEA (Economic Affairs), CCS (Security), Appointments, Political Affairs — take final collective decision |
| Line Ministries | Draft policies, pilot schemes, frame rules, implement via field agencies |
| Inter-Ministerial Groups (IMGs) / Empowered Groups of Ministers (EGoMs) | Resolve cross-cutting issues (e.g., telecom dues, disinvestment) |
2.2 NITI Aayog — The Policy Think-Tank
Established by Cabinet Resolution on 1 January 2015 replacing the 65-year-old Planning Commission (1950–2014). NITI = National Institution for Transforming India.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Nature | Non-statutory, non-constitutional — executive body |
| Chairperson | Prime Minister |
| Vice-Chairperson (2026) | Suman Bery (since May 2022) |
| CEO (2026) | B.V.R. Subrahmanyam (since February 2023) |
| Governing Council | PM + all CMs + LG/Administrators of UTs — anchors cooperative federalism |
Key differences from Planning Commission:
| Planning Commission (1950–2014) | NITI Aayog (2015–) |
|---|---|
| Top-down — imposed Five Year Plans | Bottom-up — states as equal partners |
| Allocated funds to states | No fund allocation power (transferred to Finance Ministry) |
| Focus: outlays | Focus: outcomes, strategy, competitive federalism |
| Five Year Plans (12 completed) | Three-Year Action Agendas, 7-Year Strategy, 15-Year Vision |
Flagship policy products: Strategy for New India @75, SDG India Index, Aspirational Districts Programme, Export Preparedness Index, State Health Index, Fiscal Health Index (2025).
2.3 Parliamentary Oversight
- Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs): 24 committees — 16 LS + 8 RS — scrutinise Bills, Demands for Grants, annual reports
- Public Accounts Committee / Estimates Committee / Committee on Public Undertakings — financial oversight, CAG report scrutiny
- Joint Parliamentary Committees (JPCs): For specific Bills (e.g., the JPC on the Constitution 129th Amendment — One Nation One Election, tenure extended to Monsoon Session 2026)
2.4 2nd ARC — The Governance Reform Blueprint
The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (chaired first by Veerappa Moily, then M. Veerappa Moily / V. Ramachandran) submitted 15 reports (2006–2009). Key reports relevant to policy implementation:
| Report | Core Recommendation |
|---|---|
| 1st Report — RTI | RTI as "master-key to good governance" |
| 4th Report — Ethics in Governance | Code of ethics for ministers and civil servants |
| 10th Report — Refurbishing Personnel Admin | Lateral entry, performance appraisal, domain specialisation |
| 12th Report — Citizen-Centric Administration | Citizens' Charters, Sevottam framework, grievance redress |
| 13th Report — Organisational Structure of GoI | Flatter ministries, single-point accountability, delayering |
| 15th Report — State & District Administration | District Collector as overall coordinator; decentralise fund flow |
3. Modes of Policy Instruments
Borrowing from Christopher Hood's NATO framework (Nodality, Authority, Treasure, Organisation), Indian policy uses four levers:
| Instrument | Mechanism | Indian Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation (Authority) | Laws, rules, licensing, standards | Factories Act, BNS 2023, FSSAI standards, environmental clearances |
| Fiscal (Treasure) | Taxes, subsidies, cash transfers, credit | GST, PM-KISAN (₹6,000/year), PMJDY, fertiliser subsidy, DBT |
| Organisation | PSUs, missions, special purpose vehicles | ISRO, LIC, NHAI, Jal Jeevan Mission, Smart Cities SPVs |
| Information (Nodality) | Awareness, moral suasion, nudge | Swachhta campaigns, Beti Bachao Beti Padhao, Fit India, MyGov portal |
Exam insight: Good policy design usually combines instruments. Swachh Bharat = Fiscal (₹12,000 subsidy per toilet) + Information (Swachhagrahis) + Organisation (SBM directorates) + Regulation (Solid Waste Management Rules 2016).
4. Policy Formulation — Process and Actors
4.1 The Typical Formulation Path
- Idea origination — political manifesto, Economic Survey, NITI Aayog, line ministry, media/judicial trigger
- Expert Committee / Working Group — e.g., TSR Subramanian Committee (Education), Bibek Debroy Committee (Railways), N.K. Singh Committee (FRBM)
- Inter-ministerial consultation — Cabinet Secretariat circulates note for comments
- Pre-Legislative Consultation — if a Bill is involved
- Department of Legal Affairs / Legislative Department — vetting, drafting
- Cabinet / CCEA approval
- Parliament (for Bills) or Gazette notification (for schemes/rules)
4.2 Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy (PLCP), 2014
Notified by the Ministry of Law and Justice in February 2014 on the recommendation of the NAC and the NCRWC. Key requirements:
| Requirement | Specification |
|---|---|
| Draft in public domain | Minimum 30 days before introduction in Cabinet / Parliament |
| Accompanying note | Plain-language justification, financial memorandum, environmental and fundamental-rights impact |
| Feedback summary | Ministry must publish summary of comments received |
Compliance gap: PRS Legislative Research analyses show that over 75% of Bills introduced in Parliament since 2014 have bypassed PLCP. In the 16th Lok Sabha, 142 of 186 Bills had no prior consultation; in the 17th Lok Sabha, 85 of 115 — exposing the policy's non-statutory weakness.
4.3 Role of Think Tanks and External Actors
| Actor | Contribution |
|---|---|
| NCAER (1956) | Macro-econometric modelling, Budget-time projections |
| PRS Legislative Research | Bill analysis, MP support, scrutiny of Budget |
| CPR (Centre for Policy Research) | Urban governance, land, environment |
| IDFC Institute / ORF / Takshashila | Economic and strategic policy |
| NIPFP | Fiscal federalism, public finance (advises Finance Commissions) |
| Industry bodies | CII, FICCI, ASSOCHAM, NASSCOM — sectoral inputs |
| Civil society | CHRI, PRIA, CRY — rights-based advocacy |
5. Evidence-Based Policy Making
Indian policy increasingly depends on five data pillars:
| Source | What It Measures | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| National Sample Survey (NSS) / NSO | Consumption, employment, health, education | Rounds every 5 years (major); annual PLFS |
| Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) | Employment & unemployment | Annual since 2017–18; monthly since Jan 2025 |
| National Family Health Survey (NFHS) | Demographic, maternal & child health | Quinquennial (NFHS-6 fieldwork ongoing 2025–26) |
| Census of India | Population, housing, migration | Decadal — Census 2027 notified March 2025 (reference date 1 March 2027; caste enumeration included) |
| Administrative data | Scheme MIS, UDISE+, Ayushman Bharat HMIS | Continuous |
Private data: CMIE's Consumer Pyramids, Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy unemployment estimates, NielsenIQ — used by policymakers as supplements, not substitutes.
Gaps: Census delay (last conducted 2011); discontinuation of the 2017-18 NSS Consumption Survey led to a data vacuum corrected only in 2023-24; state-level disaggregation remains weak for many schemes.
6. Implementation Challenges — The Governance Deficit
The 2nd ARC described India's implementation problem as a "governance deficit" — a gap between policy intent and delivery outcome. Key pathologies:
| Challenge | Manifestation |
|---|---|
| Centre–State coordination | Concurrent list conflicts (e.g., NEET, agriculture laws 2020–21 repeal); delayed CSS fund release |
| Bureaucratic inertia | Risk aversion post-PC Act 1988; "transfer uncertainty"; generalist vs specialist debate |
| Last-mile delivery | Sub-district capacity gap — only 55% of PHCs have sanctioned MO posts filled (Rural Health Statistics 2023–24) |
| Leakages & targeting errors | Pre-DBT PDS leakage estimated at 36% (2011–12); inclusion/exclusion errors in BPL lists |
| Capacity constraints | ~40% vacancy in district-level technical posts; limited data analytics skill in cutting-edge delivery |
| Fragmentation | Multiple schemes with overlapping objectives — 740+ CSS & CS rationalised to 28 umbrella schemes in 2021 |
| Silo mentality | Poor convergence — e.g., nutrition (WCD), health (MoHFW), water (Jal Shakti) for the same child |
7. Case Studies — Successful Implementation
7.1 Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT)
Launched 1 January 2013; re-architected post-2014 around JAM trinity (Jan Dhan, Aadhaar, Mobile).
| Metric | Figure (as of 2024–25) |
|---|---|
| Cumulative transfers since inception | ~US$ 520 billion (~₹43 lakh crore) |
| Annual transfers (FY 2023-24) | ₹6.91 lakh crore (up from ₹7,300 crore in FY 2013-14) |
| Cumulative savings from plugged leakages | ₹3.48 lakh crore |
| Beneficiary coverage | 176 crore (2023-24) vs 11 crore (2013-14) — 16-fold rise |
| Schemes on DBT platform | 300+ across 50+ ministries |
Sectoral wins: PDS savings ₹1.85 lakh crore (53% of total); PM-KISAN — 2.1 crore ineligible beneficiaries removed, saving ₹22,106 crore; MGNREGS — 98% wages transferred on time.
7.2 PM Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY)
Launched 1 May 2016 by the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas.
| Metric | Figure |
|---|---|
| Cumulative connections (July 2025) | 10.33 crore |
| Target by FY26 end | 10.58 crore (25 lakh additional approved FY26) |
| Targeted subsidy FY 2025-26 | ₹300/cylinder for up to 12 refills, outlay ₹12,000 crore |
Design learning: Initial connections outpaced refill rates (the "empty cylinder" problem); PMUY 2.0 (2021) added subsidy to ensure continued use.
7.3 PM Awas Yojana (PMAY)
| Metric | Figure (2024-25) |
|---|---|
| Houses sanctioned (Urban + Gramin, cumulative) | 3.34 crore+ |
| Houses completed (PMAY-G + PMAY-U) | 4.21 crore (in 10 years) |
| Total investment (PMAY-U) | ~₹6.13 lakh crore (Central assistance ₹1.63 lakh crore) |
| PMAY-G extension (2025–26 to 2028–29) | 2 crore additional rural houses, outlay ₹3.06 lakh crore |
7.4 Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM)
Launched 2 October 2014.
| Metric | Figure |
|---|---|
| Individual Household Latrines built | 11 crore+ |
| Community Sanitary Complexes | 2.23 lakh+ |
| Villages ODF Plus (Mar 2025) | 83% (5.64 lakh of 5.86 lakh villages) |
| Open defecation rate (WHO/UNICEF JMP 2025) | Urban 0%; rural ~11%; national ~7% |
8. Case Studies — Implementation Failures and Lessons
| Case | Failure Point | Lesson |
|---|---|---|
| MGNREGA wage delays | Repeated delays beyond 15-day statutory limit; ABPS-linked rejection of worker payments (2023-24) | Linking payment systems without last-mile verification harms intended beneficiaries |
| NFSA 2013 state variance | Inclusion/exclusion errors; Chhattisgarh 90% coverage vs some states <50%; outdated 2011 Census base | Fixed coverage ratios + delayed Census = systematic exclusion |
| PMKVY placement gap | CAG 2024: of 56 lakh certified (2016-24), only 41% (23 lakh) placed; 36% awaiting ₹500 DBT payout | Output (certification) ≠ outcome (employment) |
| Farm Laws 2020 | No pre-legislative consultation; passed via Ordinance; repealed after year-long protest, November 2021 | Consultation + federalism bypass damages policy legitimacy |
| J&K Utilisation Certificates | ₹12,000 crore UCs pending (CAG 2024) | Release-based disbursal without UC discipline creates phantom spending |
9. Reforms Architecture
9.1 PRAGATI (Pro-Active Governance And Timely Implementation)
Launched 25 March 2015 by PM Modi; convened on the 4th Wednesday of each month.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Participants | PM + Union Secretaries + State Chief Secretaries (via VC) |
| Technologies bundled | Digital data management + video-conferencing + geo-spatial |
| Review scope | Infrastructure projects, flagship schemes, grievance redressal |
| As of 2026 | ~50 meetings held; 382+ projects reviewed with aggregate investment of ~₹20–21 lakh crore |
9.2 Aspirational Districts Programme (ADP)
Launched January 2018; transformed to Aspirational Blocks Programme (500 blocks, 7 January 2023).
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Districts covered | 112 across 27 states |
| Themes | Health & Nutrition, Education, Agriculture & Water, Financial Inclusion & Skills, Basic Infrastructure |
| KPIs | 49 indicators, monthly delta ranking on Champions of Change dashboard |
| Model | 3 Cs — Convergence + Collaboration + Competition |
UNDP's 2020 evaluation confirmed ADP districts outperformed non-ADP districts on most health and nutrition indicators.
9.3 Mission Karmayogi
Approved by Union Cabinet 2 September 2020. National Programme for Civil Services Capacity Building (NPCSCB).
| Pillar | Element |
|---|---|
| Policy Framework | Rule-based → role-based HR |
| Institutional Framework | Capacity Building Commission (CBC), SPV: Karmayogi Bharat |
| Competency Framework | FRAC (Framework of Roles, Activities and Competencies) |
| Digital Framework | iGOT-Karmayogi platform — 1+ crore enrolments by 2025 |
| Target audience | ~46 lakh Central Government civil servants |
| 2026 flagship | Sādhana Saptah (capacity-building week) |
9.4 Outcome Budgeting
- Introduced in India in FY 2005-06 (UPA government)
- Output-Outcome Monitoring Framework (OOMF) from FY 2019-20 — implemented by DMEO
- Union Budget 2025-26 OOMF covers ~200+ Central Sector and Centrally Sponsored Schemes
- Each scheme has measurable outputs (physical delivery) + outcomes (welfare impact)
9.5 e-Samiksha
Real-time online monitoring system used by Cabinet Secretariat and PMO to track decisions taken in meetings — each action item owner uploads status, enabling chase-free follow-up.
10. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)
10.1 DMEO — NITI Aayog
Constituted 18 September 2015 by merging the erstwhile Programme Evaluation Organisation (PEO, 1952) and Independent Evaluation Office (IEO, 2014).
| Function | Detail |
|---|---|
| Scope | Third-party evaluation of all Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS) |
| Recent milestone | Evaluated 28 umbrella CSS (2022); input for scheme rationalisation |
| Products | National Monitoring & Evaluation Policy (draft); evaluation reports on NHM, PMKSY, PMAY-G |
10.2 Other Evaluators
| Body | Role |
|---|---|
| CAG | Performance audits of schemes (e.g., PMKVY 2024; PMAY-G 2024) |
| Parliamentary Standing Committees | Examine Demand for Grants and scheme performance |
| Ministries' internal evaluation cells | First-party monitoring |
| Academic / external | IFMR, J-PAL, 3ie — randomised evaluations (e.g., J-PAL's MGNREGA biometric study) |
11. The Federal Dimension
11.1 Centre–State Coordination Architecture
| Institution | Role |
|---|---|
| Inter-State Council (Art 263) | Constitutional body; revived 2016; discusses Centre-state and inter-state issues |
| Zonal Councils (5 — under States Reorganisation Act 1956) | Advisory; inter-state coordination |
| GST Council (Art 279A) | Federal policy success — Centre + all states; 1/3 Centre + 2/3 states vote weight |
| NITI Aayog Governing Council | PM + all CMs — strategic direction |
11.2 Cooperative vs Competitive Federalism
Cooperative federalism — Centre and states work together on shared goals (e.g., Jal Jeevan Mission, Ayushman Bharat). Competitive federalism — NITI Aayog ranks states on indices (SDG, innovation, export preparedness, Fiscal Health Index 2025) to spur reform.
11.3 Centrally Sponsored vs Central Sector Schemes
| Type | Funding | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Central Sector Scheme (CS) | 100% Centre | PM-KISAN, MPLADS, Bharatmala |
| Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS) | Cost-shared (typically 60:40; 90:10 for NE & hill states) | MGNREGA, SBM, PMAY, NHM |
Post-2015 (on Shivraj Singh Chouhan Committee recommendations), CSS have been grouped into Core of the Core (6 — fully Centre-funded, e.g., NSAP), Core (majority) and Optional schemes.
12. Key Terms
Policy Cycle — Sequential stages of policy-making: problem identification → agenda setting → formulation → adoption → implementation → evaluation.
DBT (Direct Benefit Transfer) — Electronic transfer of subsidies directly to beneficiary Aadhaar-linked bank accounts; plugs leakages.
PRAGATI — Pro-Active Governance And Timely Implementation; PM's monthly review platform launched 25 March 2015 combining digital data, video-conferencing and GIS.
Aspirational Districts Programme — NITI Aayog's 2018 initiative to rapidly transform 112 most underdeveloped districts via convergence, collaboration, competition.
DMEO — Development Monitoring and Evaluation Office, attached to NITI Aayog (Sep 2015); conducts third-party evaluation of CSS.
Mission Karmayogi (NPCSCB) — National Programme for Civil Services Capacity Building, 2020; role-based training via iGOT-Karmayogi platform.
Outcome Budgeting — Budgeting exercise that links financial outlays to measurable physical outputs and welfare outcomes; OOMF since FY 2019-20.
2nd ARC — Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2005–2009); produced 15 reports on governance reform — the foundational blueprint for India's delivery reforms.
Governance Deficit — Gap between policy intent and delivery outcome, identified by the 2nd ARC as India's core governance problem.
JAM Trinity — Jan Dhan + Aadhaar + Mobile — the digital public infrastructure that made mass DBT feasible.
13. Beyond the Book
John Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework (1984) — Policy change happens when three streams converge: the problem stream (issue recognition), policy stream (available solutions) and politics stream (political will), opened by a policy window. Indian illustration: Swachh Bharat (2014) — open defecation crisis (problem) + community-led sanitation experiments (policy) + PM's political priority (politics) aligned on 2 October 2014.
Lindblom's Incrementalism — Indian policy typically "muddles through" — e.g., PDS → NFSA 2013 → ONORC 2019 → ONORC universal 2022.
Elinor Ostrom's Polycentric Governance — Common-pool resource problems (water, forests) need nested institutions: FRA 2006 and CAMPA architecture are Indian approximations.
NITI Aayog's Strategy for New India @75 (2018) — 41 chapters across drivers, infrastructure, inclusion, governance — articulated targets for 2022-23 (India at 75). Its successor Viksit Bharat 2047 roadmap is being co-created with states through sectoral consultations (2024 onwards).
Behavioural Economics in Indian Policy — NITI Aayog's Behavioural Insights Unit (2019); Economic Survey 2018-19 dedicated a chapter to "nudge"; application in BBBP, tax compliance SMS interventions, and Jan Andolan for COVID-19.
Recent Developments (2024–2026)
Viksit Bharat 2047 — National Vision Document
Viksit Bharat 2047 (Developed India by 2047 — the centenary of independence) is the overarching policy framework replacing the older Vision 2020 and Strategy @75:
- NITI Aayog leads co-creation with states through sectoral consultations (2024 onwards)
- Target: India among the top 3 global economies; eliminate poverty; universal access to quality healthcare and education
- 12 thematic areas: infrastructure, agriculture, manufacturing, services, health, education, energy, climate, governance, science & technology, social justice, international relations
- Union Budget 2025–26 explicitly frames all allocations within the Viksit Bharat framework — the first budget to formally use this framing throughout
PM Gati Shakti — Implementation Update (2024–25)
- National Master Plan now integrates 16 ministries with a GIS-based platform for infrastructure project coordination
- 1,515 infrastructure projects mapped across states as of 2024
- PM Gati Shakti used to fast-track 100-day agenda projects of NDA 3.0 government
- National Logistics Policy (September 2022): India's LPI rank improved to 38th (from 44th in 2018) — reflecting improved infrastructure coordination
- ULIP (Unified Logistics Interface Platform): 30+ digital systems, 160 crore transactions — single-window for logistics data
PRAGATI — 50-Meeting Milestone (December 2025)
The PRAGATI platform (launched March 2015) has held 50 review meetings, reviewed 382 projects, and resolved 94% of identified bottlenecks (2,958 of 3,162). Key evolution:
- Now covers social sector projects (Ayushman Bharat, health infrastructure) — not only physical infrastructure
- Expanded to include citizen grievance categories (banking, insurance)
- This represents a model of executive-led implementation accountability — direct PM oversight shortcutting bureaucratic delays
Budget-to-Output Disconnect — Persistent Challenge
The CAG and NITI Aayog monitoring data continue to show a pattern:
- High budgetary allocations (Union Budget 2025-26: ₹11.11 lakh crore capex) but project implementation lags of 2–5 years on average for large infrastructure
- Smart Cities Mission (2015–2024): CAG audit found significant unspent balances and incomplete projects at mission end — a key implementation failure despite high allocations
- DISHA (District Development Coordination and Monitoring Committee): Mandated to coordinate 28 central schemes at district level; uneven effectiveness across states
NITI Aayog Restructuring Debate
Planning Commission → NITI Aayog (2015): The shift from directive planning to advisory + monitoring + innovation was intended to deepen federalism. However:
- States have complained NITI Aayog lacks financial leverage (it controls no funds directly — unlike the old Planning Commission with its plan funds)
- Aspirational Districts Programme (ADP): NITI Aayog's flagship convergence model for 112 most backward districts — showing positive results; redefined as Aspirational Blocks Programme (ABP) in 2023 scaling down from district to block level (500 blocks)
- AMRIT Bharat Station Scheme (2023): Demonstrates integrated policy architecture — a single scheme integrating railway modernisation, urban planning, and accessibility norms
14. Exam Strategy
Prelims high-yield facts:
- NITI Aayog — 1 January 2015; non-statutory; replaced Planning Commission (1950)
- DMEO — 18 September 2015; attached office under NITI Aayog
- PRAGATI — 25 March 2015; 4th Wednesday of every month
- Aspirational Districts — 2018; 112 districts; 49 KPIs; 5 themes
- Mission Karmayogi — 2 September 2020; iGOT-Karmayogi; ~46 lakh civil servants
- PLCP — February 2014; 30-day mandatory public draft
- 2nd ARC — 15 reports (2006–09); Chairman: Veerappa Moily
- DBT cumulative savings — ₹3.48 lakh crore; 176 crore beneficiaries (2023-24)
Mains question templates:
| Command Word | Typical Stem |
|---|---|
| "Critically examine" | "Critically examine the implementation of Direct Benefit Transfer in India. To what extent has it reduced leakages?" |
| "Discuss" | "Discuss the role of NITI Aayog in promoting cooperative and competitive federalism." |
| "Analyse" | "Analyse the pre-legislative consultation policy (2014) as a tool of participative democracy. Why does compliance remain weak?" |
| "Examine" | "'Indian policy-making suffers more from an implementation deficit than a formulation deficit.' Examine with recent examples." |
Answer-writing framework — IDEA:
- Institutions involved (NITI Aayog, ministries, states, local bodies)
- Data and dashboards (cite DBT ₹3.48 lakh crore saved; SBM 11 crore toilets; DMEO evaluations)
- Evaluations and CAG audits (PMKVY 41% placement; NFSA divergence)
- Architecture reforms (PRAGATI, ADP, Mission Karmayogi, outcome budgeting)
Conceptual bridges:
- Policy + Cooperative Federalism → GST Council, NITI Aayog Governing Council, Jal Jeevan Mission
- Policy + Civil Services → Mission Karmayogi, 2nd ARC 10th Report
- Policy + Accountability → CAG, PAC, DMEO, RTI (see Chapter 10 & 12 for statutory & RTI frameworks)
- Policy + Technology → DBT, JAM, PRAGATI, e-Samiksha
Cross-link: For scheme-wise current affairs, Budget 2025-26 allocations, and latest evaluation reports, see Ujiyari.com. See also Chapter 10 (Statutory, Regulatory & Quasi-Judicial Bodies) for the regulatory architecture that implements sectoral policy.
BharatNotes