Overview

Medieval Indian administration evolved from the relatively centralised but unstable structure of the Delhi Sultanate into the sophisticated bureaucratic machinery of the Mughal Empire. Understanding these systems — the Iqta, Mansabdari, and revenue arrangements — is essential for both Prelims (factual recall of officials, departments, and reforms) and Mains (analytical questions on the nature of the medieval state, centre-province relations, and agrarian economy).


Delhi Sultanate — Central Administration

The Sultan and His Court

The Sultan was the supreme authority — head of state, commander of the army, and (in theory) the deputy of the Caliph. However, the Delhi Sultanate never developed a fixed law of succession; power was seized by the strongest claimant, often through military force.

Central Departments

Department Head Function
Diwan-i-Wizarat Wazir (Prime Minister) Revenue and finance — the most powerful department; the Wazir supervised the entire fiscal administration
Diwan-i-Arz Ariz-i-Mamalik Military department — recruitment, equipment, pay, and review of troops; institutionalised by Balban
Diwan-i-Insha Dabir-i-Khas Royal correspondence — the formal communication channel between the Sultan and provinces; the Dabir also served as private secretary
Diwan-i-Risalat Chief Sadr / Qazi Religious affairs and appeals — its exact scope is debated; some historians describe it as handling foreign affairs or public grievances
Diwan-i-Qaza Qazi-ul-Quzat Judicial department — administered Islamic law (Sharia); the Chief Qazi was the highest judicial authority after the Sultan

Additional Departments (Later Sultanate)

Department Created by Purpose
Diwan-i-Mustakhraj Alauddin Khalji Realisation of revenue arrears
Diwan-i-Kohi Muhammad bin Tughlaq Agriculture department — to bring wasteland under cultivation and provide state loans (taqavi) to peasants
Diwan-i-Khairat Firoz Shah Tughlaq Charity department — grants, pensions, and maintenance of widows and orphans

For Prelims: Diwan-i-Arz = Military (NOT revenue); Diwan-i-Insha = Correspondence; Diwan-i-Wizarat = Finance. These are frequently tested in match-the-following questions.


The Iqta System

What Was Iqta?

The Iqta system was an administrative arrangement in which the Sultan assigned the right to collect land revenue from a territory (called an iqta) to military commanders and nobles (called muqtis or iqtadars) in lieu of salary.

Key Features

Feature Detail
Origin Borrowed from the Abbasid Caliphate; introduced in India by Iltutmish in the early 13th century
Purpose Allowed the state to maintain a large army without direct cash payments from the treasury — the iqtadar maintained troops from the iqta's revenue
Not feudal Iqtas were not hereditary and did not imply ownership of land; the Sultan could transfer iqtadars at will — historian W.H. Moreland noted that iqtas were territorial "assignments," not feudal "fiefs"
Duties Collect revenue, maintain law and order, supply troops to the Sultan on demand, remit surplus revenue to the central treasury
Supervision Under strong Sultans (Balban, Alauddin Khalji), iqtadars were closely monitored; accounts were audited and transfers were frequent

Evolution Through Sultanate Period

Period Change
Iltutmish Institutionalised the iqta system across the Sultanate; used frequent transfers to prevent iqtadars from becoming independent
Balban Militarised the system; demanded strict military obligations from iqtadars; revoked iqtas from those who did not fulfil obligations
Alauddin Khalji Centralised control — curbed the power of iqtadars, fixed revenue demands, and imposed market controls
Muhammad bin Tughlaq Experimented with the Diwan-i-Kohi and attempted to rationalise revenue assessment
Firoz Shah Tughlaq Made iqtas hereditary — this weakened central control and created a quasi-feudal landed nobility, contributing to the Sultanate's decline

For Mains: The shift from transferable iqtas (Iltutmish–Alauddin) to hereditary iqtas (Firoz Shah) is a key analytical theme. It demonstrates how decentralisation of revenue assignments weakened the medieval Indian state — a pattern that repeated under the later Mughals with the jagirdari crisis.


Alauddin Khalji's Market Reforms

Alauddin Khalji (r. 1296–1316) implemented one of the most ambitious price control experiments in medieval world history, primarily to maintain a large standing army at low cost.

Four Regulated Markets

Market Goods Controlled Enforcement Officer
Sarai Adl (Grain market) Wheat, barley, rice, pulses Diwan-i-Riyasat (Controller of Markets)
Sarai Adl (Cloth and general goods) Textiles, sugar, butter, oil, dried fruits Shahna-i-Mandi (Market Superintendent)
Horse and cattle market Horses, cattle, slaves Dedicated superintendent

Key Features

Feature Detail
Fixed prices Prices of all essential commodities — including grain, cloth, horses, cattle, and even hats and combs — were fixed by royal decree
Anti-hoarding Hoarding and profiteering were strictly banned; severe punishments (fines, imprisonment, corporal punishment) were imposed on violators
Intelligence network Barid (spies) and Munhiyan (secret reporters) monitored market prices; child employees from the royal pigeon-house made test purchases
Rationing During scarcity, grain consumption was rationed — each neighbourhood received a fixed daily supply
Revenue link Peasants were taxed at 50% of produce and forbidden from hoarding grain — ensuring a steady flow of cheap grain to Delhi's markets
Legacy Prices collapsed after Alauddin's death (1316); his son Qutbuddin Mubarak Shah quickly revoked the controls

For Mains: Alauddin's reforms are often asked in the context of "Was Alauddin Khalji's market regulation an economic reform or a military necessity?" According to Barani, the primary motive was to maintain a 475,000-strong army at minimal salary. The reforms worked during Alauddin's lifetime through fear and surveillance but were unsustainable without his authoritarian enforcement.


Mughal Central Administration

The Emperor and the Nobility

The Mughal Emperor was the apex of all authority — legislative, executive, judicial, and military. Unlike the Sultanate, the Mughals developed a more regularised bureaucracy, particularly under Akbar (r. 1556–1605).

Central Officers

Officer Title Function
Wazir / Diwan Wazir-i-Azam or Diwan-i-Ala Head of revenue and finance — the most powerful minister after the Emperor
Mir Bakshi Head of military administration — maintained the roster of mansabdars, presented candidates for appointment, supervised intelligence
Mir Saman Khan-i-Saman In charge of the imperial household, karkhanas (workshops), and supplies
Sadr-us-Sudur Head of religious affairs and charitable grants (madad-i-maash)
Qazi-ul-Quzat Chief Qazi Head of the judicial system — administered Islamic law
Muhtasib Censor of public morals — regulated market practices, weights and measures

The Mansabdari System

What Was It?

The Mansabdari system was a graded military-civil service introduced by Akbar in which every officer (mansabdar) held a mansab (rank) that determined his status, pay, and military obligations.

Dual Ranks: Zat and Sawar

Rank Meaning
Zat Personal rank — indicated the mansabdar's position in the hierarchy and determined his personal pay
Sawar Cavalry rank — indicated the number of horsemen the mansabdar was obliged to maintain

Classification of Mansabdars

Class Rule
First Class Sawar rank equals Zat rank
Second Class Sawar rank is more than half but less than Zat rank
Third Class Sawar rank is half or less of Zat rank

Hierarchy of Ranks

Category Rank Range Title
Ordinary mansabdars 10 to 500 Mansabdar
Amirs 500 to 2,500 Amir
Amir-i-Azam 2,500 to 5,000 Great Amir
Princes and highest nobles Above 5,000 Reserved initially for princes; later expanded under Aurangzeb to 7,000

Key Features

Feature Detail
Appointment All mansabdars were appointed by the Emperor; the rank was not hereditary
Payment Mansabdars were paid through jagir assignments (revenue-collecting territories) or, less commonly, cash salary
Obligations Maintain the prescribed number of horses, elephants, and soldiers according to the sawar rank; present for periodic muster (chehra/dagh — branding of horses)
Hierarchy Zat rank determined overall seniority — a mansabdar with 5,000 zat and 2,000 sawar outranked one with 4,000 zat and 3,000 sawar
Decline Under later Mughals, the number of mansabdars expanded faster than available jagirs — the "jagirdari crisis" weakened the empire

For Prelims: Mansabdari = Akbar; Zat = personal rank; Sawar = cavalry obligation. The system was NOT hereditary. Ranks above 5,000 were initially reserved for princes.


Jagirdari System

Feature Detail
What Jagirs were revenue assignments given to mansabdars in lieu of cash salary — the jagirdar collected revenue from the assigned territory
Types Tankha jagir (transferable, most common), Watan jagir (hereditary, given to Rajput chiefs for their home territories), Mashrut jagir (conditional, tied to an office)
Difference from Iqta Jagirs were part of a more regulated system; the Mughal state maintained detailed records of expected revenue (jama) and actual collection (hasil)
Crisis By Aurangzeb's reign, the number of mansabdars exceeded available jagir land — nobles were assigned jagirs in distant, revenue-poor provinces — this "bejagiri" (lack of jagirs) destabilised the empire

Revenue Systems

Mughal Revenue Methods

Method Description Region
Zabti (Dahsala) Land measured; average of last 10 years' (dah-sal) produce and prices used to fix revenue demand in cash; introduced by Raja Todar Mal under Akbar (1580) Lahore to Allahabad, Malwa, Gujarat — the most productive Mughal heartland
Batai (Ghalla-bakhshi) Crop-sharing — produce divided at the threshing floor, typically one-third to the state Widely used where Zabti could not be applied
Nasaq Rough assessment based on past records and local estimates; peasants given remission for crop failure Common where detailed measurement was impractical
Kankut Visual estimation of standing crop yield per bigha, classified by soil quality (good, middle, bad) Originated under Sher Shah; refined under Akbar

Todar Mal's Bandobast (Zabti System) — Details

Feature Detail
Who Raja Todar Mal, Akbar's Diwan (finance minister)
When Finalised in 1580 after years of experimentation
Method Land measured using standardised bamboo rods joined with iron rings (replacing the older rope, which shrank when wet); average produce and prices of the last 10 years calculated for each crop
Revenue demand State share was approximately one-third of the produce, expressed in cash
Land classification Polaj (cultivated every year), Parauti (fallow for 1–2 years), Chachar (fallow 3–4 years), Banjar (fallow 5+ years)
Administrative unit Revenue circles (dastur) with separate schedules for individual crops
Significance Created a rational, standardised revenue system across the Mughal heartland; provided stability to peasants by fixing demand in advance

For Prelims: Zabti = Dahsala = Todar Mal's Bandobast. Iron-ring bamboo rods replaced ropes. Land classified as Polaj, Parauti, Chachar, Banjar. State demand was ~1/3 of produce, expressed in cash based on 10-year average.


Sher Shah Suri's Administration (1540–1545)

Despite ruling for only five years, Sher Shah Suri created an administrative template that the Mughals (especially Akbar) later adopted and refined.

Administrative Reforms

Reform Detail
Revenue system Measured land with standardised units; fixed revenue at approximately one-third of average produce; introduced the patta (deed showing amount to be paid) and qabuliyat (agreement by peasant)
Currency Standardised the silver Rupiya (178 grains / ~11.53 g) — this became the basis of the modern Indian rupee
Road network Built four major highways: (1) Grand Trunk Road — Sonargaon (Bengal) to Peshawar; (2) Agra to Multan via Delhi; (3) Agra to Burhanpur; (4) Lahore to Multan
Sarais Constructed nearly 1,700 rest houses along major roads; each sarai had a well, a mosque, and separate quarters for Hindu and Muslim travellers
Postal system Established Dak Chaukis (postal stations) at sarais for communication and intelligence
Local administration Empire divided into 47 Sarkars, each subdivided into Parganas

Pargana-Level Officials

Official Function
Shiqdar Military and law enforcement at pargana level
Amin Land revenue assessment and collection
Fotedar Treasurer
Karkuns (2) Hindu and Muslim accountants who maintained records in local languages and Persian

For Mains: "Sher Shah laid the foundations on which Akbar built." This is a classic UPSC assertion. Sher Shah's revenue measurement, Pargana administration, silver rupee, and road-sarai network were all adopted by Akbar. The key difference is that Akbar systematised and scaled these reforms through the Mansabdari-Jagirdari framework.


Mughal Provincial Administration

Administrative Hierarchy

The Mughal Empire under Akbar was divided into 15 Subahs (provinces), subdivided into 187 Sarkars (districts), further into 3,367 Mahals/Parganas (sub-districts).

Provincial Officers

Officer Appointed by Function
Subedar (Sipah Salar) Emperor Provincial governor — maintained law and order, led military campaigns, supervised all provincial administration
Diwan Emperor (independently) Provincial finance — supervised revenue collection, maintained accounts; reported directly to the central Diwan, NOT the Subedar — this ensured checks and balances
Bakshi Emperor Provincial military pay and muster
Sadr Emperor Religious affairs and charitable grants at provincial level
Qazi Emperor Judicial administration — applied Sharia law
Faujdar Emperor Military administrator at sarkar (district) level — maintained law and order, assisted in revenue collection when force was needed
Kotwal Emperor City administrator — policing, maintaining registers of residents and visitors, enforcing fair trade practices, standard weights and measures
Amalguzar Revenue collector at pargana level

For Mains: The Mughal system of appointing the Subedar and Diwan independently — both reporting to the Emperor — was a deliberate check on provincial autonomy. This dual-control mechanism weakened when the Emperor himself became weak under the Later Mughals, as Subedars absorbed the Diwan's functions and became de facto independent rulers.


Comparison: Sultanate vs Mughal Administration

Feature Delhi Sultanate Mughal Empire
Succession No fixed law; military seizure common Theoretically hereditary; but wars of succession frequent
Revenue system Iqta-based; varied from Sultan to Sultan; peaked under Alauddin's centralisation Mansabdari-Jagirdari; Zabti system provided standardisation under Akbar
Military system Iqtadars maintained troops; no uniform salary structure Mansabdari with graded zat-sawar ranks; standardised military obligations
Provincial control Iqtadars as governors; limited central oversight except under strong Sultans Subedar + Diwan (independent checks); Faujdar at district level
Revenue assessment Varied; Alauddin imposed 50% of produce; no standardised measurement Zabti (Dahsala) — measured land, 10-year average, cash demand at ~1/3
Currency Iltutmish's tanka; Muhammad bin Tughlaq's failed token currency Built on Sher Shah's rupee; standardised gold mohur, silver rupee, copper dam
Judicial system Qazi-ul-Quzat; Islamic law; Sultan's arbitrary justice More regularised; Qazi system with appeal structure; Emperor as final court
Religious policy Varied — Alauddin secular-pragmatist; Firoz Shah orthodox Akbar's Sulh-i-kul (universal peace); Aurangzeb's orthodoxy
Decline trigger Hereditary iqtas (Firoz Shah); Timur's invasion (1398) Jagirdari crisis; Aurangzeb's overexpansion; provincial autonomy

UPSC Relevance

Prelims Focus Areas

  • Diwan-i-Arz = Military department (headed by Ariz-i-Mamalik), NOT revenue
  • Diwan-i-Insha = Department of Correspondence (Dabir-i-Khas)
  • Iqta system institutionalised by Iltutmish; made hereditary by Firoz Shah Tughlaq
  • Mansabdari: Zat = personal rank; Sawar = cavalry rank; introduced by Akbar
  • Zabti/Dahsala system = Todar Mal's Bandobast (1580); 10-year average
  • Sher Shah's Rupiya: 178 grains of silver; basis of modern rupee
  • Sher Shah built Grand Trunk Road (Sonargaon to Peshawar) with 1,700 sarais
  • Land classification: Polaj, Parauti, Chachar, Banjar
  • Mughal provinces: 15 Subahs under Akbar

Mains Focus Areas

  • Iqta vs Jagirdari: evolution from non-hereditary assignment to hereditary tenure and its consequences
  • Alauddin Khalji's market reforms: military necessity or economic experiment?
  • "Sher Shah laid the foundations on which Akbar built" — evaluate
  • Mansabdari-Jagirdari crisis under later Mughals as a cause of imperial decline
  • Centre-province relations: the dual appointment of Subedar and Diwan
  • Revenue administration's impact on the peasantry: was the medieval state exploitative or stabilising?

Vocabulary

Mansabdar

  • Pronunciation: /mʌnˈsʌbdɑːr/
  • Definition: A military-civil official in the Mughal Empire who held a ranked position (mansab) determining his status, salary, and obligation to maintain a prescribed number of cavalry, with dual designations of zat (personal) and sawar (horsemen) ranks.
  • Origin: From Arabic mansab (منصب, "rank, position, office"), combining with the Persian agent suffix -dar ("holder"); literally "holder of a rank" — the system was introduced by Akbar to replace the irregular Sultanate nobility with a graded, centrally controlled bureaucracy.

Iqtadar

  • Pronunciation: /ɪqˈtɑːdɑːr/
  • Definition: The holder of an iqta — a territorial revenue assignment given by the Delhi Sultan in lieu of salary, obligating the holder to maintain troops, collect revenue, administer the territory, and remit surplus to the central treasury.
  • Origin: From Arabic iqta' (إقطاع, "allotment, grant of land revenue"), from the root qa-ta-a ("to cut, to allot"), combined with Persian -dar ("holder"); the Iqta system originated in the Abbasid Caliphate and was adapted for Indian conditions by Iltutmish.

Bandobast

  • Pronunciation: /bʌndoˈbʌst/
  • Definition: A settlement or arrangement, particularly referring to Raja Todar Mal's systematic revenue settlement (Zabti/Dahsala) under Akbar, which standardised land measurement, crop assessment, and cash-based revenue demand across the Mughal heartland.
  • Origin: From Hindi-Urdu bandobast (बंदोबस्त / بندوبست), from Persian band-o-bastband ("tying, binding") + bast ("arrangement"); literally "a binding arrangement" — reflecting the formal, contractual nature of the revenue settlement between the state and the peasant.

Key Terms

Jagirdari Crisis

  • Pronunciation: /dʒɑːɡɪrˈdɑːri ˈkraɪsɪs/
  • Definition: The structural fiscal crisis of the later Mughal Empire (late 17th–18th century) in which the number of mansabdars and their rank inflation vastly exceeded the available revenue-yielding jagir land, resulting in the assignment of distant and unproductive territories, noble dissatisfaction, and the progressive collapse of the Mansabdari system.
  • Context: As Aurangzeb expanded the empire into the Deccan, thousands of Maratha and Deccani nobles were absorbed into the Mansabdari system, but there was insufficient jagir land to sustain them — leading to what Satish Chandra termed the "crisis of the jagirdari system," a key structural cause of Mughal decline.
  • UPSC Relevance: GS1 (Medieval India). Prelims: the concept of bejagiri (jagir shortage) and its link to Mughal decline. Mains: asked to analyse structural causes of Mughal decline — the Jagirdari crisis is central to any answer, alongside Aurangzeb's Deccan policy, religious intolerance, and provincial revolts.

Zabti System

  • Pronunciation: /ˈzʌbti ˈsɪstəm/
  • Definition: The standardised revenue assessment method introduced by Raja Todar Mal under Akbar (finalised 1580), in which land was measured using iron-ring bamboo rods, crops were classified, and revenue demand was fixed in cash based on the average produce and prices of the preceding ten years (Dahsala), applied across the Mughal heartland from Lahore to Allahabad.
  • Context: Also known as the Dahsala system or Todar Mal's Bandobast; replaced earlier crop-sharing methods with a predictable cash demand, giving peasants certainty and the state a stable fiscal base — the most sophisticated pre-modern revenue system in Indian history.
  • UPSC Relevance: GS1 (Medieval India). Prelims: frequently tested — Zabti = Dahsala = Todar Mal; iron-ring bamboo rods; land classification (Polaj, Parauti, Chachar, Banjar); 10-year average. Mains: asked to assess Akbar's land revenue system and its impact on the peasantry, often compared with British Permanent Settlement.

Sources: Satish Chandra — History of Medieval India, Irfan Habib — The Agrarian System of Mughal India, Abul Fazl — Ain-i-Akbari, NCERT — Themes in Indian History Part II, Ziauddin Barani — Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi, W.H. Moreland — The Agrarian System of Moslem India, vajiramandravi.com, cbc.gov.in (Public Administration — Mughal Empire)