Overview
Medieval Indian administration evolved from the relatively centralised but unstable structure of the Delhi Sultanate into the sophisticated bureaucratic machinery of the Mughal Empire. Understanding these systems — the Iqta, Mansabdari, and revenue arrangements — is essential for both Prelims (factual recall of officials, departments, and reforms) and Mains (analytical questions on the nature of the medieval state, centre-province relations, and agrarian economy).
Delhi Sultanate — Central Administration
The Sultan and His Court
The Sultan was the supreme authority — head of state, commander of the army, and (in theory) the deputy of the Caliph. However, the Delhi Sultanate never developed a fixed law of succession; power was seized by the strongest claimant, often through military force.
Central Departments
| Department | Head | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Diwan-i-Wizarat | Wazir (Prime Minister) | Revenue and finance — the most powerful department; the Wazir supervised the entire fiscal administration |
| Diwan-i-Arz | Ariz-i-Mamalik | Military department — recruitment, equipment, pay, and review of troops; institutionalised by Balban |
| Diwan-i-Insha | Dabir-i-Khas | Royal correspondence — the formal communication channel between the Sultan and provinces; the Dabir also served as private secretary |
| Diwan-i-Risalat | Chief Sadr / Qazi | Religious affairs and appeals — its exact scope is debated; some historians describe it as handling foreign affairs or public grievances |
| Diwan-i-Qaza | Qazi-ul-Quzat | Judicial department — administered Islamic law (Sharia); the Chief Qazi was the highest judicial authority after the Sultan |
Additional Departments (Later Sultanate)
| Department | Created by | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Diwan-i-Mustakhraj | Alauddin Khalji | Realisation of revenue arrears |
| Diwan-i-Kohi | Muhammad bin Tughlaq | Agriculture department — to bring wasteland under cultivation and provide state loans (taqavi) to peasants |
| Diwan-i-Khairat | Firoz Shah Tughlaq | Charity department — grants, pensions, and maintenance of widows and orphans |
For Prelims: Diwan-i-Arz = Military (NOT revenue); Diwan-i-Insha = Correspondence; Diwan-i-Wizarat = Finance. These are frequently tested in match-the-following questions.
The Iqta System
What Was Iqta?
The Iqta system was an administrative arrangement in which the Sultan assigned the right to collect land revenue from a territory (called an iqta) to military commanders and nobles (called muqtis or iqtadars) in lieu of salary.
Key Features
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Origin | Borrowed from the Abbasid Caliphate; introduced in India by Iltutmish in the early 13th century |
| Purpose | Allowed the state to maintain a large army without direct cash payments from the treasury — the iqtadar maintained troops from the iqta's revenue |
| Not feudal | Iqtas were not hereditary and did not imply ownership of land; the Sultan could transfer iqtadars at will — historian W.H. Moreland noted that iqtas were territorial "assignments," not feudal "fiefs" |
| Duties | Collect revenue, maintain law and order, supply troops to the Sultan on demand, remit surplus revenue to the central treasury |
| Supervision | Under strong Sultans (Balban, Alauddin Khalji), iqtadars were closely monitored; accounts were audited and transfers were frequent |
Evolution Through Sultanate Period
| Period | Change |
|---|---|
| Iltutmish | Institutionalised the iqta system across the Sultanate; used frequent transfers to prevent iqtadars from becoming independent |
| Balban | Militarised the system; demanded strict military obligations from iqtadars; revoked iqtas from those who did not fulfil obligations |
| Alauddin Khalji | Centralised control — curbed the power of iqtadars, fixed revenue demands, and imposed market controls |
| Muhammad bin Tughlaq | Experimented with the Diwan-i-Kohi and attempted to rationalise revenue assessment |
| Firoz Shah Tughlaq | Made iqtas hereditary — this weakened central control and created a quasi-feudal landed nobility, contributing to the Sultanate's decline |
For Mains: The shift from transferable iqtas (Iltutmish–Alauddin) to hereditary iqtas (Firoz Shah) is a key analytical theme. It demonstrates how decentralisation of revenue assignments weakened the medieval Indian state — a pattern that repeated under the later Mughals with the jagirdari crisis.
Alauddin Khalji's Market Reforms
Alauddin Khalji (r. 1296–1316) implemented one of the most ambitious price control experiments in medieval world history, primarily to maintain a large standing army at low cost.
Four Regulated Markets
| Market | Goods Controlled | Enforcement Officer |
|---|---|---|
| Sarai Adl (Grain market) | Wheat, barley, rice, pulses | Diwan-i-Riyasat (Controller of Markets) |
| Sarai Adl (Cloth and general goods) | Textiles, sugar, butter, oil, dried fruits | Shahna-i-Mandi (Market Superintendent) |
| Horse and cattle market | Horses, cattle, slaves | Dedicated superintendent |
Key Features
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Fixed prices | Prices of all essential commodities — including grain, cloth, horses, cattle, and even hats and combs — were fixed by royal decree |
| Anti-hoarding | Hoarding and profiteering were strictly banned; severe punishments (fines, imprisonment, corporal punishment) were imposed on violators |
| Intelligence network | Barid (spies) and Munhiyan (secret reporters) monitored market prices; child employees from the royal pigeon-house made test purchases |
| Rationing | During scarcity, grain consumption was rationed — each neighbourhood received a fixed daily supply |
| Revenue link | Peasants were taxed at 50% of produce and forbidden from hoarding grain — ensuring a steady flow of cheap grain to Delhi's markets |
| Legacy | Prices collapsed after Alauddin's death (1316); his son Qutbuddin Mubarak Shah quickly revoked the controls |
For Mains: Alauddin's reforms are often asked in the context of "Was Alauddin Khalji's market regulation an economic reform or a military necessity?" According to Barani, the primary motive was to maintain a 475,000-strong army at minimal salary. The reforms worked during Alauddin's lifetime through fear and surveillance but were unsustainable without his authoritarian enforcement.
Mughal Central Administration
The Emperor and the Nobility
The Mughal Emperor was the apex of all authority — legislative, executive, judicial, and military. Unlike the Sultanate, the Mughals developed a more regularised bureaucracy, particularly under Akbar (r. 1556–1605).
Central Officers
| Officer | Title | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Wazir / Diwan | Wazir-i-Azam or Diwan-i-Ala | Head of revenue and finance — the most powerful minister after the Emperor |
| Mir Bakshi | — | Head of military administration — maintained the roster of mansabdars, presented candidates for appointment, supervised intelligence |
| Mir Saman | Khan-i-Saman | In charge of the imperial household, karkhanas (workshops), and supplies |
| Sadr-us-Sudur | — | Head of religious affairs and charitable grants (madad-i-maash) |
| Qazi-ul-Quzat | Chief Qazi | Head of the judicial system — administered Islamic law |
| Muhtasib | — | Censor of public morals — regulated market practices, weights and measures |
The Mansabdari System
What Was It?
The Mansabdari system was a graded military-civil service introduced by Akbar in which every officer (mansabdar) held a mansab (rank) that determined his status, pay, and military obligations.
Dual Ranks: Zat and Sawar
| Rank | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Zat | Personal rank — indicated the mansabdar's position in the hierarchy and determined his personal pay |
| Sawar | Cavalry rank — indicated the number of horsemen the mansabdar was obliged to maintain |
Classification of Mansabdars
| Class | Rule |
|---|---|
| First Class | Sawar rank equals Zat rank |
| Second Class | Sawar rank is more than half but less than Zat rank |
| Third Class | Sawar rank is half or less of Zat rank |
Hierarchy of Ranks
| Category | Rank Range | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary mansabdars | 10 to 500 | Mansabdar |
| Amirs | 500 to 2,500 | Amir |
| Amir-i-Azam | 2,500 to 5,000 | Great Amir |
| Princes and highest nobles | Above 5,000 | Reserved initially for princes; later expanded under Aurangzeb to 7,000 |
Key Features
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Appointment | All mansabdars were appointed by the Emperor; the rank was not hereditary |
| Payment | Mansabdars were paid through jagir assignments (revenue-collecting territories) or, less commonly, cash salary |
| Obligations | Maintain the prescribed number of horses, elephants, and soldiers according to the sawar rank; present for periodic muster (chehra/dagh — branding of horses) |
| Hierarchy | Zat rank determined overall seniority — a mansabdar with 5,000 zat and 2,000 sawar outranked one with 4,000 zat and 3,000 sawar |
| Decline | Under later Mughals, the number of mansabdars expanded faster than available jagirs — the "jagirdari crisis" weakened the empire |
For Prelims: Mansabdari = Akbar; Zat = personal rank; Sawar = cavalry obligation. The system was NOT hereditary. Ranks above 5,000 were initially reserved for princes.
Jagirdari System
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| What | Jagirs were revenue assignments given to mansabdars in lieu of cash salary — the jagirdar collected revenue from the assigned territory |
| Types | Tankha jagir (transferable, most common), Watan jagir (hereditary, given to Rajput chiefs for their home territories), Mashrut jagir (conditional, tied to an office) |
| Difference from Iqta | Jagirs were part of a more regulated system; the Mughal state maintained detailed records of expected revenue (jama) and actual collection (hasil) |
| Crisis | By Aurangzeb's reign, the number of mansabdars exceeded available jagir land — nobles were assigned jagirs in distant, revenue-poor provinces — this "bejagiri" (lack of jagirs) destabilised the empire |
Revenue Systems
Mughal Revenue Methods
| Method | Description | Region |
|---|---|---|
| Zabti (Dahsala) | Land measured; average of last 10 years' (dah-sal) produce and prices used to fix revenue demand in cash; introduced by Raja Todar Mal under Akbar (1580) | Lahore to Allahabad, Malwa, Gujarat — the most productive Mughal heartland |
| Batai (Ghalla-bakhshi) | Crop-sharing — produce divided at the threshing floor, typically one-third to the state | Widely used where Zabti could not be applied |
| Nasaq | Rough assessment based on past records and local estimates; peasants given remission for crop failure | Common where detailed measurement was impractical |
| Kankut | Visual estimation of standing crop yield per bigha, classified by soil quality (good, middle, bad) | Originated under Sher Shah; refined under Akbar |
Todar Mal's Bandobast (Zabti System) — Details
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Who | Raja Todar Mal, Akbar's Diwan (finance minister) |
| When | Finalised in 1580 after years of experimentation |
| Method | Land measured using standardised bamboo rods joined with iron rings (replacing the older rope, which shrank when wet); average produce and prices of the last 10 years calculated for each crop |
| Revenue demand | State share was approximately one-third of the produce, expressed in cash |
| Land classification | Polaj (cultivated every year), Parauti (fallow for 1–2 years), Chachar (fallow 3–4 years), Banjar (fallow 5+ years) |
| Administrative unit | Revenue circles (dastur) with separate schedules for individual crops |
| Significance | Created a rational, standardised revenue system across the Mughal heartland; provided stability to peasants by fixing demand in advance |
For Prelims: Zabti = Dahsala = Todar Mal's Bandobast. Iron-ring bamboo rods replaced ropes. Land classified as Polaj, Parauti, Chachar, Banjar. State demand was ~1/3 of produce, expressed in cash based on 10-year average.
Sher Shah Suri's Administration (1540–1545)
Despite ruling for only five years, Sher Shah Suri created an administrative template that the Mughals (especially Akbar) later adopted and refined.
Administrative Reforms
| Reform | Detail |
|---|---|
| Revenue system | Measured land with standardised units; fixed revenue at approximately one-third of average produce; introduced the patta (deed showing amount to be paid) and qabuliyat (agreement by peasant) |
| Currency | Standardised the silver Rupiya (178 grains / ~11.53 g) — this became the basis of the modern Indian rupee |
| Road network | Built four major highways: (1) Grand Trunk Road — Sonargaon (Bengal) to Peshawar; (2) Agra to Multan via Delhi; (3) Agra to Burhanpur; (4) Lahore to Multan |
| Sarais | Constructed nearly 1,700 rest houses along major roads; each sarai had a well, a mosque, and separate quarters for Hindu and Muslim travellers |
| Postal system | Established Dak Chaukis (postal stations) at sarais for communication and intelligence |
| Local administration | Empire divided into 47 Sarkars, each subdivided into Parganas |
Pargana-Level Officials
| Official | Function |
|---|---|
| Shiqdar | Military and law enforcement at pargana level |
| Amin | Land revenue assessment and collection |
| Fotedar | Treasurer |
| Karkuns (2) | Hindu and Muslim accountants who maintained records in local languages and Persian |
For Mains: "Sher Shah laid the foundations on which Akbar built." This is a classic UPSC assertion. Sher Shah's revenue measurement, Pargana administration, silver rupee, and road-sarai network were all adopted by Akbar. The key difference is that Akbar systematised and scaled these reforms through the Mansabdari-Jagirdari framework.
Mughal Provincial Administration
Administrative Hierarchy
The Mughal Empire under Akbar was divided into 15 Subahs (provinces), subdivided into 187 Sarkars (districts), further into 3,367 Mahals/Parganas (sub-districts).
Provincial Officers
| Officer | Appointed by | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Subedar (Sipah Salar) | Emperor | Provincial governor — maintained law and order, led military campaigns, supervised all provincial administration |
| Diwan | Emperor (independently) | Provincial finance — supervised revenue collection, maintained accounts; reported directly to the central Diwan, NOT the Subedar — this ensured checks and balances |
| Bakshi | Emperor | Provincial military pay and muster |
| Sadr | Emperor | Religious affairs and charitable grants at provincial level |
| Qazi | Emperor | Judicial administration — applied Sharia law |
| Faujdar | Emperor | Military administrator at sarkar (district) level — maintained law and order, assisted in revenue collection when force was needed |
| Kotwal | Emperor | City administrator — policing, maintaining registers of residents and visitors, enforcing fair trade practices, standard weights and measures |
| Amalguzar | — | Revenue collector at pargana level |
For Mains: The Mughal system of appointing the Subedar and Diwan independently — both reporting to the Emperor — was a deliberate check on provincial autonomy. This dual-control mechanism weakened when the Emperor himself became weak under the Later Mughals, as Subedars absorbed the Diwan's functions and became de facto independent rulers.
Comparison: Sultanate vs Mughal Administration
| Feature | Delhi Sultanate | Mughal Empire |
|---|---|---|
| Succession | No fixed law; military seizure common | Theoretically hereditary; but wars of succession frequent |
| Revenue system | Iqta-based; varied from Sultan to Sultan; peaked under Alauddin's centralisation | Mansabdari-Jagirdari; Zabti system provided standardisation under Akbar |
| Military system | Iqtadars maintained troops; no uniform salary structure | Mansabdari with graded zat-sawar ranks; standardised military obligations |
| Provincial control | Iqtadars as governors; limited central oversight except under strong Sultans | Subedar + Diwan (independent checks); Faujdar at district level |
| Revenue assessment | Varied; Alauddin imposed 50% of produce; no standardised measurement | Zabti (Dahsala) — measured land, 10-year average, cash demand at ~1/3 |
| Currency | Iltutmish's tanka; Muhammad bin Tughlaq's failed token currency | Built on Sher Shah's rupee; standardised gold mohur, silver rupee, copper dam |
| Judicial system | Qazi-ul-Quzat; Islamic law; Sultan's arbitrary justice | More regularised; Qazi system with appeal structure; Emperor as final court |
| Religious policy | Varied — Alauddin secular-pragmatist; Firoz Shah orthodox | Akbar's Sulh-i-kul (universal peace); Aurangzeb's orthodoxy |
| Decline trigger | Hereditary iqtas (Firoz Shah); Timur's invasion (1398) | Jagirdari crisis; Aurangzeb's overexpansion; provincial autonomy |
UPSC Relevance
Prelims Focus Areas
- Diwan-i-Arz = Military department (headed by Ariz-i-Mamalik), NOT revenue
- Diwan-i-Insha = Department of Correspondence (Dabir-i-Khas)
- Iqta system institutionalised by Iltutmish; made hereditary by Firoz Shah Tughlaq
- Mansabdari: Zat = personal rank; Sawar = cavalry rank; introduced by Akbar
- Zabti/Dahsala system = Todar Mal's Bandobast (1580); 10-year average
- Sher Shah's Rupiya: 178 grains of silver; basis of modern rupee
- Sher Shah built Grand Trunk Road (Sonargaon to Peshawar) with 1,700 sarais
- Land classification: Polaj, Parauti, Chachar, Banjar
- Mughal provinces: 15 Subahs under Akbar
Mains Focus Areas
- Iqta vs Jagirdari: evolution from non-hereditary assignment to hereditary tenure and its consequences
- Alauddin Khalji's market reforms: military necessity or economic experiment?
- "Sher Shah laid the foundations on which Akbar built" — evaluate
- Mansabdari-Jagirdari crisis under later Mughals as a cause of imperial decline
- Centre-province relations: the dual appointment of Subedar and Diwan
- Revenue administration's impact on the peasantry: was the medieval state exploitative or stabilising?
Vocabulary
Mansabdar
- Pronunciation: /mʌnˈsʌbdɑːr/
- Definition: A military-civil official in the Mughal Empire who held a ranked position (mansab) determining his status, salary, and obligation to maintain a prescribed number of cavalry, with dual designations of zat (personal) and sawar (horsemen) ranks.
- Origin: From Arabic mansab (منصب, "rank, position, office"), combining with the Persian agent suffix -dar ("holder"); literally "holder of a rank" — the system was introduced by Akbar to replace the irregular Sultanate nobility with a graded, centrally controlled bureaucracy.
Iqtadar
- Pronunciation: /ɪqˈtɑːdɑːr/
- Definition: The holder of an iqta — a territorial revenue assignment given by the Delhi Sultan in lieu of salary, obligating the holder to maintain troops, collect revenue, administer the territory, and remit surplus to the central treasury.
- Origin: From Arabic iqta' (إقطاع, "allotment, grant of land revenue"), from the root qa-ta-a ("to cut, to allot"), combined with Persian -dar ("holder"); the Iqta system originated in the Abbasid Caliphate and was adapted for Indian conditions by Iltutmish.
Bandobast
- Pronunciation: /bʌndoˈbʌst/
- Definition: A settlement or arrangement, particularly referring to Raja Todar Mal's systematic revenue settlement (Zabti/Dahsala) under Akbar, which standardised land measurement, crop assessment, and cash-based revenue demand across the Mughal heartland.
- Origin: From Hindi-Urdu bandobast (बंदोबस्त / بندوبست), from Persian band-o-bast — band ("tying, binding") + bast ("arrangement"); literally "a binding arrangement" — reflecting the formal, contractual nature of the revenue settlement between the state and the peasant.
Key Terms
Jagirdari Crisis
- Pronunciation: /dʒɑːɡɪrˈdɑːri ˈkraɪsɪs/
- Definition: The structural fiscal crisis of the later Mughal Empire (late 17th–18th century) in which the number of mansabdars and their rank inflation vastly exceeded the available revenue-yielding jagir land, resulting in the assignment of distant and unproductive territories, noble dissatisfaction, and the progressive collapse of the Mansabdari system.
- Context: As Aurangzeb expanded the empire into the Deccan, thousands of Maratha and Deccani nobles were absorbed into the Mansabdari system, but there was insufficient jagir land to sustain them — leading to what Satish Chandra termed the "crisis of the jagirdari system," a key structural cause of Mughal decline.
- UPSC Relevance: GS1 (Medieval India). Prelims: the concept of bejagiri (jagir shortage) and its link to Mughal decline. Mains: asked to analyse structural causes of Mughal decline — the Jagirdari crisis is central to any answer, alongside Aurangzeb's Deccan policy, religious intolerance, and provincial revolts.
Zabti System
- Pronunciation: /ˈzʌbti ˈsɪstəm/
- Definition: The standardised revenue assessment method introduced by Raja Todar Mal under Akbar (finalised 1580), in which land was measured using iron-ring bamboo rods, crops were classified, and revenue demand was fixed in cash based on the average produce and prices of the preceding ten years (Dahsala), applied across the Mughal heartland from Lahore to Allahabad.
- Context: Also known as the Dahsala system or Todar Mal's Bandobast; replaced earlier crop-sharing methods with a predictable cash demand, giving peasants certainty and the state a stable fiscal base — the most sophisticated pre-modern revenue system in Indian history.
- UPSC Relevance: GS1 (Medieval India). Prelims: frequently tested — Zabti = Dahsala = Todar Mal; iron-ring bamboo rods; land classification (Polaj, Parauti, Chachar, Banjar); 10-year average. Mains: asked to assess Akbar's land revenue system and its impact on the peasantry, often compared with British Permanent Settlement.
Sources: Satish Chandra — History of Medieval India, Irfan Habib — The Agrarian System of Mughal India, Abul Fazl — Ain-i-Akbari, NCERT — Themes in Indian History Part II, Ziauddin Barani — Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi, W.H. Moreland — The Agrarian System of Moslem India, vajiramandravi.com, cbc.gov.in (Public Administration — Mughal Empire)
BharatNotes