Why this chapter matters for UPSC: Citizenship questions run from GS1 (migration, the urban poor) through GS2 (Part II of the Constitution, the Citizenship Act and its amendments, refugees) to GS4 (the ethics of turning refugees away). NCERT's chapter explains what "full and equal membership" means and where it is contested: migrants and "outsiders", the urban poor, tribal people, national identity, refugees and the stateless, and global citizenship. It is unchanged in the Reprint 2026-27. This page adds the law NCERT does not cover (the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2019, the Immigration and Foreigners Act 2025, the Section 6A judgment and the Assam NRC), each dated from the official record, and corrects NCERT's box on the Olga Tellis judgment, which puts words in the Court's mouth.
🧠 First Principles — Read This First
Citizenship is full and equal membership of a political community. States give their members a collective political identity and certain rights, and citizens expect protection even when they travel. The importance of membership is clearest in its absence: refugees and illegal migrants whom no state will accept are guaranteed rights by none.
Rights of citizenship were won, not given. NCERT traces them through struggles against monarchies (the French Revolution of 1789), against colonial rule, against apartheid in South Africa (until the early 1990s), and today through the women's and dalit movements. Citizenship is also about citizen-to-citizen relations: legal duties and a moral obligation to take part in and contribute to shared life, as inheritors and trustees of the country's culture and natural resources.
Equal citizenship is a project, not a finished fact. The formal law is a starting point. New groups raise new claims (migrants, slum-dwellers, tribal people, the displaced), and in a democracy these claims must be negotiated, not settled by force.
PART 1 — Quick Reference
The Chapter at a Glance
| NCERT section | Core question | NCERT's examples |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 Introduction | What rights and obligations does membership bring? | Palestinian refugees; South African passes; women's and dalit movements |
| 6.2 Full and equal membership | Equal rights wherever one lives and works? | "Mumbai for Mumbaikars"; IT workers in Bangalore; nurses from Kerala; Martin Luther King |
| 6.3 Equal rights | Basic rights and a minimum standard for rich and poor alike? | Slum-dwellers; street vendors; Olga Tellis; tribal people and forest dwellers; Zimbabwe |
| 6.4 Citizen and nation | How inclusive is national identity? | France (turbans and headscarves), Israel, Germany (Turkish workers), India |
| 6.5 Universal citizenship | What of refugees and stateless people? | Darfur, Palestinians, Burmese, Bangladeshis; UNHCR; the Dalai Lama, 1959 |
| 6.6 Global citizenship | Can it supplement national citizenship? | The 2004 tsunami; terrorist networks; bird flu |
Marshall's Three Kinds of Citizenship Rights (NCERT box)
| Right | What it protects | Marshall's point |
|---|---|---|
| Civil | Life, liberty and property | Citizenship is "a status bestowed on those who are full members of a community. All who possess the status are equal with respect to the rights and duties with which the status is endowed." |
| Political | Participation in governance | Equality grows in two ways: the quality of rights and duties improves, and the number of people who hold them grows |
| Social | Access to education and employment | Social class is "a system of inequality"; citizenship counters it and integrates the community |
Indian Citizenship Law at a Glance (beyond NCERT)
| Item | What the record shows |
|---|---|
| Constitution | Part II (Arts. 5-11): citizenship at commencement; Parliament regulates the rest by law |
| Modes of acquiring (NCERT) | Birth, descent, registration, naturalisation, inclusion of territory |
| Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 | Act 47 of 2019; in force 10 January 2020 (S.O. 172(E)); Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian migrants from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who entered on or before 31 December 2014 not treated as illegal migrants; Rules notified 11 March 2024 |
| Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 | Act 13 of 2025 (assent 4 April 2025); repeals the Passport (Entry into India) Act 1920, Registration of Foreigners Act 1939, Foreigners Act 1946 and Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act 2000 |
| Exemption Order, 1 September 2025 (S.O. 3997(E)) | Exempts members of those six communities from those three countries who entered on or before 31 December 2024 from passport and visa requirements; it does not change the Citizenship Act's 31 December 2014 cut-off for citizenship |
| Section 6A (Assam Accord) | Upheld by the Supreme Court on 17 October 2024 by majority (Justice Pardiwala dissenting) |
| Assam NRC | Final list published 31 August 2019; 19,06,657 persons excluded |
PART 2 — Concepts & Narrative
What Citizenship Means
Citizenship is "full and equal membership of a political community". In most democracies citizens' rights include political rights (the vote), civil rights (freedom of speech or belief) and some socio-economic rights (a minimum wage, education). "Equality of rights and status is one of the basic rights of citizenship."
Each of these rights was won by struggle: against powerful monarchies in Europe, sometimes violently, as in the French Revolution of 1789; by colonies in Asia and Africa demanding equal citizenship as part of independence; by black South Africans against the white minority until the early 1990s. NCERT's Let's Think describes South Africa until 1994: whites could vote, contest elections, buy property and move freely; blacks could not; they lived in separate colonies, needed passes to work in white areas, could not keep their families there, and went to separate schools. Did black South Africans have full and equal membership? The women's and dalit movements in India are, in NCERT's account, struggles of the same kind.
Citizenship is also about relations among citizens. It involves legal obligations to the state and a moral obligation to participate in and contribute to the community's shared life. Citizens are "the inheritors and trustees of the culture and natural resources of the country."
Full and Equal Membership: Insiders and Outsiders
In a crowded railway compartment or bus, people who fought each other to get in soon find a shared interest in keeping others out. The same thing happens in cities, regions and nations: when jobs, medical care, education, land or water are scarce, people demand that "outsiders", even fellow citizens, be kept out. "Mumbai for Mumbaikars" is NCERT's example.
Freedom of movement is especially important for workers. Labour migrates for jobs: IT workers to Bangalore, nurses from Kerala all over the country, construction and road workers from many regions. Local people may resist jobs going to outsiders, sometimes at lower wages, and demand that jobs be reserved for residents or speakers of the local language; parties take up the cause and resistance can turn violent. NCERT asks: does freedom of movement include the right to live or work anywhere? And are we as welcoming to poor, unskilled migrants as to skilled, affluent ones?
Disputes are inevitable in a democracy. Citizens may protest, as part of freedom of expression, provided they do not harm life or property; they may form groups, demonstrate, use the media, appeal to parties or go to court. "A basic principle of democracy is that such disputes should be settled by negotiation and discussion rather than force. This is one of the obligations of citizenship."
Martin Luther King Jr. (NCERT box). In the 1950s the Civil Rights Movement rose against the segregation laws of many southern US states, which separated "coloured" and white people in railways, buses, theatres, housing, hotels and restaurants. King argued against them on three grounds: (1) every person is equal in self-worth and dignity regardless of race or colour; (2) segregation is a "social leprosy" on the body politic that inflicts deep psychological wounds, and it diminishes the quality of life for whites too (a community closed its parks rather than admit black people as a court directed; baseball teams were disbanded rather than accept black players); (3) segregation creates artificial boundaries that stop people from cooperating for the country's good. He called for peaceful, non-violent resistance: "We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence."
NCERT's Let's Think on migration: argue for and against freedom of movement and occupation across the country; should long-term inhabitants of a region get preference for jobs and facilities; should states fix quotas in professional colleges for students from other states? Article 19(1)(d) and (e) give every citizen the right to move freely and to reside and settle anywhere in India, subject to reasonable restrictions in the interests of the general public or to protect any Scheduled Tribe (Article 19(5)).
Equal Rights: The Urban Poor, Tribal People and Policy
Does full and equal membership mean every citizen, rich or poor, should be guaranteed basic rights and a minimum standard of living? NCERT takes the urban poor. Slum-dwellers and squatters do necessary work (hawking, petty trade, scavenging, domestic work, plumbing, mechanics; small businesses such as cane weaving, textile printing, tailoring) yet are treated as unwelcome, blamed for straining resources and spreading crime and disease. Conditions are shocking: crammed rooms without toilets, running water or sanitation, insecure life and property, little city spending on them. Even the vote is hard to exercise, because the voters' list needs a fixed address.
Awareness is growing. NCERT notes a national policy on urban street vendors framed in January 2004 to give vendors recognition and freedom from harassment if they followed regulations, and asks students to find out about the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (Act No. 7 of 2014, assent 4 March 2014).
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (decided 10 July 1985): what the Court actually held. NCERT's box says the Supreme Court held that Article 21 included the right to livelihood and that "if pavement dwellers were to be evicted they should first be provided alternative accommodation under the right to shelter." The first half is right: the Court read the right to livelihood into the right to life. The second half is not the Court's ruling, and the sentence in quotation marks is not from the judgment. The Court held that the Municipal Commissioner was justified in directing removal of encroachments on pavements, footpaths and accessory roads. It directed that pavement dwellers censused in 1976 "should be given, though not as a condition precedent to their removal, alternate pitches at Malavani" or another convenient place, and that slum-dwellers with identity cards from the 1976 census "must be given alternate sites for their resettlement". Alternative accommodation was a direction for some, not a precondition for eviction.
Tribal people and forest dwellers depend on access to forests and natural resources. Their way of life and livelihood are threatened by population pressure, commercial interests mining forests or coasts, and tourism. Governments struggle to protect them and their habitat without endangering the country's development, an issue that affects all citizens. Equal rights need not mean uniform policies: if the aim is to make people more equal, the different needs and claims of groups must shape policy.
NCERT's Let's Think on Zimbabwe gives official figures from the 1990s: about 4,400 white families owned 32 per cent of agricultural land (about 10 million hectares) while about one million black peasant families owned 16 million hectares, 38 per cent, mostly less fertile and unirrigated; whites, 0.06 per cent of the population, had taken the fertile land a century earlier; in 1997 President Mugabe announced plans to take over about 1,500 farms. What ideas of citizenship support or oppose the claims of black and white Zimbabweans? NCERT's conclusion for the section: changes in the world, the economy and society demand new interpretations of citizenship's rights; equal rights and protection for all citizens should guide policy.
Citizen and Nation
The nation state is modern; one of the earliest assertions of its sovereignty and of citizens' democratic rights came from the French revolutionaries in 1789. Nation states claim their boundaries define a territory and a unique culture and history, expressed through a flag, anthem, language and ceremonies. Democratic states try to define national identity inclusively, but most make it easier for some citizens to identify with the state than others, and easier to extend citizenship to some than others, the United States included.
- France claims to be secular and inclusive. Citizens, including those of North African origin, are expected to assimilate into the national culture and language in public life while keeping personal beliefs in private. But the line between public and private is hard to draw: Sikh boys wanting to wear turbans and Muslim girls wanting headscarves at school were refused by some schools as religious symbols in public education. Assimilation is easier for some groups than others.
- Israel and Germany may give priority to religion or ethnic origin in granting citizenship. In Germany, Turkish workers once encouraged to come have demanded automatic citizenship for children born and raised there; NCERT says this "is still being debated".
- India defines itself as a secular, democratic nation state. The independence movement deliberately bound together people of different religions, regions and cultures; Partition in 1947 only strengthened the resolve to keep the nation secular and inclusive, and the Constitution embodied it. It sought full and equal citizenship for groups as different as Scheduled Castes and Tribes, women without previous equal rights, and remote communities of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, while letting people keep their beliefs, languages and practices: "a unique experiment". The Republic Day parade symbolises the effort to include all regions, cultures and religions.
Citizenship provisions are in Part II of the Constitution and in laws passed by Parliament. Citizenship can be acquired by birth, descent, registration, naturalisation, or inclusion of territory. The state may not discriminate on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, and religious and linguistic minorities are protected. Yet even these provisions are contested by the women's movement, the dalit movement and people displaced by development projects. "Democratic citizenship in any country is a project, an ideal to work towards."
Citizenship law since NCERT was written (from the official records).
- The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (Act 47 of 2019) came into force on 10 January 2020 (MHA notification S.O. 172(E)). It provides that Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian migrants from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who entered India on or before 31 December 2014 shall not be treated as illegal migrants, opening a path to citizenship. The Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024 were notified on 11 March 2024. Petitions challenging the Act are before the Supreme Court; a bench listed them for final hearing in May 2026, and no judgment had been reported as of late September 2026 (Supreme Court Observer).
- The Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 (Act 13 of 2025, assent 4 April 2025) replaced four older laws: the Passport (Entry into India) Act 1920, the Registration of Foreigners Act 1939, the Foreigners Act 1946 and the Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act 2000. Under it, the Immigration and Foreigners (Exemption) Order, 2025 (S.O. 3997(E), 1 September 2025) exempts members of the same six communities from the same three countries who sought shelter because of religious persecution and entered on or before 31 December 2024 from the Act's passport and visa requirements. It is an immigration exemption; the Citizenship Act's cut-off for citizenship remains 31 December 2014.
- Section 6A of the Citizenship Act 1955 (inserted after the Assam Accord) was upheld by a five-judge bench on 17 October 2024: the majority held it "falls within the bounds of the Constitution"; Justice J.B. Pardiwala dissented.
- The National Register of Citizens in Assam: the final list was published on 31 August 2019 and excluded 19,06,657 persons (as recorded by the Gauhati High Court in January 2026, which also noted the petitioners' contention that the list had not been notified in the Official Gazette).
Universal Citizenship: Refugees and the Stateless
Refugees and illegal migrants come in many images: people from Asia or Africa paying agents to smuggle them into Europe or America; people displaced by war or famine; refugees in Darfur, Palestinians, Burmese, Bangladeshis. Democratic theory says citizenship should be universal, yet every state fixes criteria for citizenship in its constitution and laws and uses its power, even walls and fences, to keep unwanted visitors out. People displaced by war, persecution or famine whom no state will accept become stateless peoples or refugees, often in camps or living as illegal migrants, unable to work legally, educate their children or own property. The problem is large enough that the UN appointed a High Commissioner for Refugees.
States weigh humanitarian duty against numbers and security. India "prides itself on providing refuge to persecuted peoples, as it did with the Dalai Lama and his followers in 1959." Entry from neighbouring countries has taken place along all of India's borders; many remain stateless for years or generations, and only a few are eventually granted citizenship. Can citizenship solve their problem, or do we need a more universal identity?
The numbers today (beyond NCERT): UNHCR's population statistics for end-2025 count about 28.5 million refugees under UNHCR's mandate (down from about 31.0 million at end-2024) and about 4.48 million stateless people. India is a country of emigration too: the Ministry of External Affairs counts 3,72,80,845 overseas Indians as of January 2026 (1,95,20,317 persons of Indian origin and 1,77,60,528 non-resident Indians).
Global Citizenship
NCERT asks what links three statements: the world's outpouring of help for victims of the 2004 tsunami in South Asia, international networks linking terrorists, and the UN's work with states against bird flu and a possible human pandemic. We live in an interconnected world: the internet, television and mobile phones put us in immediate contact with distant events and create shared concerns.
Supporters of global citizenship argue that people already feel linked across borders, as the tsunami response showed, and that this feeling should be strengthened. National citizenship assumes the state can protect our rights, but states face problems they cannot tackle alone. Global citizenship might make it easier to deal with cross-border problems, such as migrants and stateless people, by guaranteeing basic rights wherever they live. But NCERT concludes that problems within a country, like socio-economic inequality, can ultimately be solved only by that country's government and people, so full and equal membership of a state remains important. Global citizenship reminds us that national citizenship needs supplementing by awareness of an interconnected world and readiness to work across borders. NCERT points students to UNESCO's Global Citizenship Education (GCED).
PART 3 — UPSC Integration
Cross-paper relevance
- GS1: internal migration, the urban poor and slums, tribal displacement; why cities attract migrants.
- GS2: Part II of the Constitution; the Citizenship Act and the 2019 amendment; the 2025 immigration law; Section 6A and the NRC; Article 19(1)(d), (e) and 19(5); street vendors' law.
- GS4: refugees and non-refoulement; the dignity of migrant workers; negotiation over force as a civic duty.
- Essay: "Citizenship is a project, not a status", "Insiders and outsiders in a nation of migrants".
Applying the Chapter
| Question theme | What to use |
|---|---|
| Restrictions on movement and residence | NCERT's insiders/outsiders; skilled versus poor migrants; Art. 19(1)(d), (e) and 19(5) |
| Refugees and persecution | NCERT 6.5: UNHCR, the Dalai Lama (1959), statelessness; CAA and the 2025 exemption order |
| Migrant workers at the margins | Slum-dwellers' contribution; the voter-address problem; Olga Tellis (as actually decided) |
| Equal rights for all citizens | Marshall's three rights; "equal rights need not mean uniform policies" |
| National identity and minorities | France's assimilation, Germany's Turkish workers, India's inclusive experiment |
Exam Strategy
For Prelims: know NCERT's definition, Marshall's three rights and his book (Citizenship and Social Class, 1950; Marshall 1893-1981), the five modes of acquiring Indian citizenship, the CAA's dates (Act in force 10 January 2020; Rules 11 March 2024) and cut-off (31 December 2014), the September 2025 exemption order (entry up to 31 December 2024, passport and visa exemption only), the Section 6A judgment (17 October 2024), and the NRC numbers.
For Mains: NCERT's six exercises ask which rights and obligations democratic citizenship brings, why equal rights may not be equally exercised, two struggles for citizen rights in India, the problems of refugees and how global citizenship could help, what migrants contribute to local economies, and why democratic citizenship is "a project rather than an accomplished fact". Use NCERT's material: the crowded compartment, Kerala nurses and Bangalore IT workers, the slum-dweller without an address, King's three arguments, and the French school controversy.
Avoid: saying the September 2025 order extended the CAA's citizenship cut-off; repeating NCERT's sentence that the Court required alternative accommodation before any eviction in Olga Tellis; treating "nationality" and "citizenship" as NCERT's paired terms (NCERT does not use that distinction).
Practice Questions
Practice (UPSC-pattern, not past papers). Mains items 1 to 4 are NCERT's own exercises.
Prelims:
T.H. Marshall's three kinds of citizenship rights, as NCERT presents them, are:
(a) natural, legal and moral (b) civil, political and social
(c) individual, group and national (d) economic, cultural and religiousWhich of the following is NOT one of the modes of acquiring Indian citizenship listed by NCERT?
(a) Registration (b) Naturalisation (c) Inclusion of territory (d) InvestmentWith reference to the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, consider the following statements:
- It came into force on 10 January 2020.
- It covers migrants from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who entered India on or before 31 December 2014.
- Its cut-off for citizenship was moved to 31 December 2024 by an order of September 2025.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3
- It came into force on 10 January 2020.
In Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985), the Supreme Court:
(a) held that pavement dwellers could never be evicted
(b) read the right to livelihood into Article 21 but upheld the removal of encroachments, directing alternate sites for some
(c) struck down the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act
(d) declared housing a Fundamental Right under Article 19The Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 repealed which of the following?
- The Foreigners Act, 1946
- The Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920
- The Citizenship Act, 1955
(a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3
- The Foreigners Act, 1946
Answers: 1 (b); 2 (d); 3 (a); 4 (b); 5 (b).
Mains:
- Citizenship as full and equal membership involves both rights and obligations. Which rights can citizens expect in most democratic states today, and what obligations do they have to the state and to fellow citizens? (NCERT)
- All citizens may be granted equal rights but not all may be able to exercise them equally. Explain. (NCERT)
- What are some of the problems faced by refugees? How could the concept of global citizenship benefit them? (NCERT)
- "Democratic citizenship is a project rather than an accomplished fact even in countries like India which grant equal citizenship." Discuss some issues regarding citizenship being raised in India today. (NCERT)
- Migration within India is often resisted by local inhabitants. Examine the constitutional position and the contribution migrants make to local economies. (250 words)
- "Refugees should not be turned back to the country where they would face persecution." Examine with reference to India's practice. (150 words)
📦 Revision Capsule
Hard Facts
- Citizenship = full and equal membership of a political community; rights won by struggle (France 1789; colonies; South Africa to the early 1990s)
- Marshall (1893-1981), Citizenship and Social Class (1950): civil, political, social rights
- Five modes: birth, descent, registration, naturalisation, inclusion of territory; Part II, Arts. 5-11
- Olga Tellis 10-7-1985: livelihood in Art. 21; removal of encroachments upheld; alternate sites for 1976-census dwellers, not a precondition
- Street Vendors Act, 2014 (Act 7 of 2014, assent 4-3-2014)
- CAA: Act 47 of 2019, in force 10-1-2020; cut-off 31-12-2014; Rules 11-3-2024; challenge pending
- Immigration and Foreigners Act 2025 (Act 13; repeals 1920, 1939, 1946, 2000 Acts); Exemption Order S.O. 3997(E) of 1-9-2025 (entry up to 31-12-2024; passport and visa only)
- Section 6A upheld 17-10-2024 (Pardiwala J dissenting); NRC 31-8-2019, 19,06,657 excluded
- UNHCR end-2025: refugees under mandate about 28.5 million; stateless about 4.48 million; MEA: 3.73 crore overseas Indians (January 2026)
Core Concepts
- Membership matters most to those denied it
- Freedom of movement versus "outsider" resentment; skilled versus poor migrants
- Equal rights need not mean uniform policies
- National identity can include or exclude; India's Constitution chose inclusion
- Global citizenship supplements, it does not replace, national citizenship
Confused Pairs
- CAA cut-off (31-12-2014, citizenship) vs 2025 exemption (31-12-2024, passport and visa)
- Refugee (fled persecution or war) vs stateless person (no state recognises them)
- Assimilation (France: public conformity) vs accommodation (India: diversity kept)
- What NCERT says Olga Tellis held vs what the Court held
PYQ Pattern
- Mains has asked how the fundamental right to movement and residence is restricted (GS2), whether refugees should be turned back to persecution (GS4), how migrant workers stay at the margins (GS4), and why large cities attract migrants (GS1): each draws on this chapter's sections 6.2, 6.3 and 6.5.
Sources
- NCERT, Political Theory (Class XI), ch. 6 "Citizenship", Reprint 2026-27: ncert.nic.in PDF; pre-2022 text in the book archive, Wayback copy of October 2021.
- Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 10 July 1985: Indian Kanoon.
- The Constitution of India, as on 11 November 2025 (Part II; Art. 19): Legislative Department PDF.
- Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 commencement, S.O. 172(E), 10 January 2020 (Gazette copy): LiveLaw PDF; CAA Rules notified 11 March 2024 (PIB, 15 May 2024): pib.gov.in.
- The Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 (Act 13 of 2025): PRS PDF; Immigration and Foreigners (Exemption) Order, 2025, S.O. 3997(E), 1 September 2025: Gazette copy, Tripura High Court.
- In re: Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, 17 October 2024: Indian Kanoon.
- Gauhati High Court judgment of 22 January 2026 (recording the NRC figures): Indian Kanoon.
- CAA challenge status: Supreme Court Observer case tracker: scobserver.in.
- Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014: PRS PDF.
- UNHCR population statistics, world totals for 2025: UNHCR population API; MEA, Population of Overseas Indians (as of January 2026): mea.gov.in.
BharatNotes